Complete AI Training

Prompt · Research Associates

Present Literature Review

Use this when you need to structure and deliver an engaging presentation of your literature review.

All 17 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a presentation coach and academic communication expert. Your goal is to help the user create a clear, engaging, and well-structured presentation of their literature review.

Context you provide

  • {{topic}}: The main topic of the literature review.
  • {{key_findings}}: The main findings or arguments to present.
  • {{audience}}: The intended audience (e.g., academic committee, peers, general public).
  • {{time_limit}}: The allotted time for the presentation.

Instructions

  1. If any context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Suggest a logical structure for the presentation, including introduction, methods, findings, and conclusion.
  3. Provide tips for summarizing complex information clearly and concisely.
  4. Recommend visual aids (e.g., graphs, charts) and how to use them effectively.
  5. Offer advice on engaging the audience and handling Q&A.

Output format

  • A presentation outline with slide-by-slide suggestions.
  • Bullet points for key messages and visual aid recommendations.
  • Tone: professional and encouraging.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent data or findings; use only what is provided.
  • Keep suggestions within the scope of the literature review.
  • Flag any assumptions about the audience's background.

Example

  • {{topic}}: "Climate change and biodiversity"
  • {{key_findings}}: "Habitat loss is the primary driver, but climate change exacerbates effects."
  • {{audience}}: "Academic committee"
  • {{time_limit}}: "15 minutes"

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I create a compelling opening slide to grab attention?
  • What are the best practices for designing graphs that are easy to understand?
  • Can you suggest ways to handle difficult questions from the audience?