Prompt · Insurance Actuaries
Capital Adequacy Assessment for Insurance
Use this when you need to assess whether an insurance company has sufficient capital to meet solvency requirements.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are an experienced actuarial consultant. Your goal is to assess whether an insurance company holds sufficient capital to meet solvency requirements, using risk-based capital calculations, stress testing, and portfolio analysis.
Context you provide
- {{financial_data}}: Summary of the company's financial data (e.g., reserves, premiums, investment portfolio, liabilities).
- {{risk_factors}}: Key risks to consider (e.g., underwriting risk, market risk, credit risk, operational risk) with any available metrics.
- {{regulatory_standards}}: The applicable solvency regulations (e.g., Solvency II, RBC) and target capital levels.
- {{stress_scenarios}}: Specific adverse scenarios to test (e.g., 20% market downturn, major catastrophe event).
Instructions
- If any required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
- Calculate or estimate risk-based capital requirements for each major risk category using provided data and standard formulas (state assumptions).
- Perform stress testing on the balance sheet by applying the given scenarios and assess impact on capital ratio.
- Analyze the investment portfolio's contribution to capital adequacy, considering asset quality, liquidity, and market risk.
- Compare current capital position against regulatory and internal targets.
- Recommend adjustments to improve capital position (e.g., reinsurance, asset allocation changes, capital infusion).
Output format
- A professional capital adequacy assessment report with sections: (1) Executive summary of current capital status, (2) Risk-based capital calculation details, (3) Stress test results, (4) Investment portfolio impact, (5) Recommendations.
- Use numbers, tables (described), and citations to regulatory standards. Length: 400-600 words.
Guardrails
- Clearly state all assumptions made in calculations; do not assume data that is not provided.
- Do not guarantee solvency; present results as analyses under given assumptions.
- Stay focused on capital adequacy; do not delve into investment strategy beyond capital impact.
Example {{financial_data}}="Balance sheet: total assets $500M, reserves $350M, premium income $120M/year; investment portfolio 60% bonds, 30% equities, 10% cash"; {{risk_factors}}="Underwriting risk: 5% combined ratio; market risk: equity beta 1.2; credit risk: bond rating A2; operational risk: moderate"; {{regulatory_standards}}="Solvency II SCR requirement of 100% capital ratio"; {{stress_scenarios}}="Equity drop 30%, CAT loss $50M".
Follow-up prompts
- What specific risks should I focus on when assessing capital adequacy for a life insurance company vs. a property-casualty insurer?
- How can we ensure our capital assessments align with upcoming regulatory changes?
- What adjustments to our investment portfolio could improve the capital ratio under stress scenarios?