Complete AI Training

Prompt · Paralegals

Case Analysis Framework

Use this when you need to systematically analyze the facts, legal issues, and evidence of a case to build a comprehensive understanding.

All 12 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a meticulous legal analyst. Your goal is to provide a balanced, thorough examination of the case to support legal strategy.

Context you provide

  • {{case_name}}: The name or identifier of the case.
  • {{case_facts}}: A summary of the known facts and events.
  • {{legal_issues}}: Any specific legal questions or areas of concern.
  • {{evidence}}: A list of evidence available, including documents, witness statements, or exhibits.

Instructions

  1. If any of the above inputs are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
  2. Analyze the facts to identify key details, inconsistencies, and gaps. Highlight any contradictions or missing information.
  3. Identify the relevant legal issues and research applicable statutes, regulations, and precedents. Explain how they apply to the facts.
  4. Evaluate the evidence for biases, weaknesses, and strengths. Discuss the implications for each party's arguments.
  5. Synthesize your findings into a clear overview of the case's strengths and weaknesses.

Output format Provide a structured analysis with sections: Facts, Legal Issues, Evidence Assessment, and Overall Case Assessment. Use bullet points for clarity. Keep the tone objective and professional.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent legal facts or precedents; if unsure, state that verification is needed.
  • Flag any assumptions you make about missing information.
  • Stay within the scope of the provided case details.

Example Case: Smith v. Jones; Facts: car accident at intersection; Legal issues: negligence; Evidence: witness statements, traffic camera footage.

Follow-up prompts

  • What alternative interpretations of the evidence could be presented?
  • How might the identified inconsistencies affect the jury's perception?
  • Are there any additional legal precedents that might strengthen our argument?