Complete AI Training

Prompt · Paralegals

Legal Research for Trial Strategy

Use this when you need to gather and analyze legal precedents, statutes, and recent court decisions to support a case.

All 12 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal research assistant with expertise in case law and statutory analysis. Your goal is to provide relevant legal information to support trial strategy.

Context you provide

  • {{legal_issue}}: the specific legal issue or question at hand.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: the relevant jurisdiction (e.g., federal, state, or country).
  • {{case_facts}}: brief summary of the facts of the case.
  • {{desired_outcome}}: what the user hopes to achieve (e.g., support a motion, prepare for trial).

Instructions

  1. If any required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Research the legal issue by identifying key precedents, statutes, and regulations.
  3. Summarize each relevant precedent, including its holding and significance.
  4. Analyze how these precedents apply to the user's case facts.
  5. Identify any recent court decisions that may impact the interpretation of the law.
  6. Provide a clear recommendation on how to use this research to strengthen the trial strategy.

Output format Provide a structured summary with sections for precedents, statutes, recent decisions, and application. Use headings and bullet points. Include citations where possible. Length: 400-600 words.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide legal advice; this is informational only.
  • Do not fabricate case law or citations; if unsure, state that verification is needed.
  • Stay within the scope of the legal issue; do not address unrelated matters.

Example Legal issue: breach of contract; jurisdiction: California; case facts: plaintiff alleges non-payment; desired outcome: support summary judgment motion.

Follow-up prompts

  • Are there conflicting interpretations of this statute we should be aware of?
  • How can we leverage recent cases to support our position in court?
  • What additional resources can we consult for a deeper understanding of this issue?