Complete AI Training
Sign inGet my AI kit

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

AI agent for penetration testers

Pentest Report Drafting Agent

A clear, consistent, evidence-backed report ready for the client

Pentest Report Drafting Agent: what goes in, what the agent does and what you get

What it does

A penetration test is only as useful as its report, and writing clear, consistent findings eats testing time. This agent takes the confirmed findings and drafts the report in your template: an executive summary for leaders, and for each finding the description, affected assets, severity, business impact and a concrete fix. It checks that every finding has evidence, severity and a remediation. Where impact or remediation is missing, it flags the gap for the tester instead of leaving it blank. It groups findings with the same root cause under one fix. Then it checks that severities are consistent across similar findings. It keeps the summary plain for non-technical readers and the detail precise. You approve the report before it goes to the client. Edge case: the client is never told to fix the same thing twice.

How it works

Follow the arrows from top to bottom. The orange dashed arrow is the loop: when a check fails, the agent goes back and tries again.

Start and resultWhat it doesA check on its own workWaits for your OKGoes back and retries
Yes, continueYes, continueApprovedNoNo 1 STARTS WHEN Findings confirmed 2 USES A TOOL Load the confirmed findings, evidence and reporttemplate 3 DOES Draft the summary and per-finding sections 4 CHECKS THE RESULT Does every finding have evidence, severity, impactand remediation? If not: flag the gaps for the tester to complete. Backto step 3. 5 DOES Group findings that share a root cause 6 CHECKS THE RESULT Are severities consistent across similar findings? If not: correct the outlier rating and note the reason.Back to step 5. 7 DOES Prepare the final draft for review 8 YOU APPROVE Tester approves the report for the client 9 RESULT Report delivered to the client
Read the steps as a list
  1. Findings confirmed
  2. Load the confirmed findings, evidence and report template
  3. Draft the summary and per-finding sections
  4. Does every finding have evidence, severity, impact and remediation?If not: flag the gaps for the tester to complete. Back to step 3.
  5. Group findings that share a root cause
  6. Are severities consistent across similar findings?If not: correct the outlier rating and note the reason. Back to step 5.
  7. Prepare the final draft for review
  8. Tester approves the report for the clientThe agent waits here for your OK.
  9. Report delivered to the client

How it decides

It includes a finding only when it has evidence, severity and remediation, and keeps ratings consistent across the report.

  • Require evidence, severity and remediation per finding
  • Group findings with a shared root cause
  • Keep severities consistent across the report

Make it yours

Every agent is a starting point. You choose these settings for your own situation.

  • Report template
  • Severity method
  • Summary reading level
  • Grouping rules

What keeps you in control

It always asks you first

  • Sending the report to the client

Hard limits

  • Does not send the report without approval
  • Does not invent impact or remediation

It stops when

  • Done: report complete and approved
  • Stop: findings lack evidence

Set it up

We guide you through the set-up, step by step

Members get the full set-up guide for this agent. No technical skills needed: you copy, paste and upload.

10 minto set it up in your AI
5 AIsChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, Grok
  • One set of instructions to paste into your AI, with the clicks for ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Gemini and Grok
  • The agent then walks you through connecting your own data, one source at a time
  • A downloadable copy with the flow chart, the rules and the full guide
Get access to this agent

An example run

What happensDrafting the June report for Marston Utilities from 24 findings, the agent grouped three outdated-library findings under one fix. The completeness check failed for two findings with no business impact, so it flagged them for the tester. The consistency check then found one medium rated differently from a near-identical high, so it corrected it. The lead tester approved the report on June 21.

More agents for penetration testers