Program stakeholder evidence register

For program managers, turn authorized requirement statements and meeting records into stakeholder requirement register. Address this specific problem: stakeholder requirements are remembered inaccurately. The aim: separate stated needs from manager assumptions. The pilot tests whether that benefit holds up against reviewer effort and real operating costs.

The buyer creates a project, supplies authorized requirement statements and meeting records, and confirms scope and access. Users correct extracted facts, resolve flagged uncertainties and approve the final stakeholder requirement register before use. Retain source links and a version history for the next cycle.

How the AI works

AI assists these bounded tasks: link requested outcomes; preserve source context; flag unconfirmed assumptions. Use only authorized requirement statements and meeting records and preserve uncertainty in stakeholder requirement register. Keep model suggestions separate from verified facts. Link factual outputs to authorized input evidence and show missing information explicitly. Use deterministic checks for counts, dates, identifiers and arithmetic where applicable. A designated reviewer validates consequential outputs and signs off the delivered result.

Safeguards

Confirm owners, decisions and commitments. Keep employee discussion notes access-controlled and avoid covert individual performance inference. One organization, one defined input format and one representative pilot batch using authorized requirement statements and meeting records. Professional judgment, physical inspections, live external actions and production certification remain outside this prototype. Require appropriate access and publication approval. Preserve source material, label AI drafts and make corrections traceable. Measure false positives and missed cases alongside speed.

What to build first

Costed pilot: One organization, one defined input format and one representative pilot batch using authorized requirement statements and meeting records. Professional judgment, physical inspections, live external actions and production certification remain outside this prototype. Start with one buyer organization and a bounded set of representative inputs. Implement the first two modules: link requested outcomes; preserve source context. Support the third task through an assisted review queue: flag unconfirmed assumptions. Handle the remaining required functions manually until validated. Include input upload, source references, user correction, a reviewer approval step and export of stakeholder requirement register. Authentication, account isolation, deletion controls and basic operational logging are included. Specialized production certification, live write integrations and broader rollout are not included unless explicitly stated.

What it can connect to

Team updates, calendars, project records and agreed management routines. Source systems, catalog exports and cloud file storage. Start with reversible CSV or file imports and validate identifiers before any direct writes. Begin with uploads and exports of authorized requirement statements and meeting records. Any named system or connector is a candidate requiring current access and compatibility checks; no live connection is included by default.

The screens in detail

Use a searchable table or visual gallery with filters for the domain’s important attributes. Open each item into a detail drawer containing source records, ownership and history. Put proposed merges and field changes in a separate review queue. Provide a preview before any bulk export. Open with brief and sources; move into program stakeholder evidence register for the detailed task; finish in review and delivery for review and handoff. Show the source record, uncertainty and approval status beside each proposed output.