Agentic AI Is Moving Into Finance Operations
AppZen recently put a spotlight on agentic AI, sharing an educational reading list and pointing to use cases across accounts payable, travel and expense, and card audits. The message is simple: AI agents aren't theory anymore-they're starting to take on real work. For finance ops leaders, that means shorter cycle times, tighter controls, and more time for exceptions that actually need a human.
What "AI agents" mean for AP, T&E, and card programs
Think of an AI agent as software that can accept a goal, reason through steps, take actions across systems, and check its own work-escalating when confidence is low. In finance ops, that translates into fewer touches and more consistent decisions.
- AP: Intake and classify invoices, match POs, chase missing approvals, suggest GL codes, and flag duplicates or policy gaps.
- T&E: Enforce policy at submission, match receipts to transactions, classify merchants, and spot suspicious patterns early.
- Card audit: Continuously scan for out-of-policy spend, MCC anomalies, split transactions, and potential fraud indicators.
Why this matters right now
Backlogs, fraud risk, and audit pressure aren't going away. Agentic AI can cut manual review, raise straight-through processing, and keep logs for audit without adding headcount. Independent analyses also point to sizable productivity gains from advanced AI across functions, finance included.
McKinsey research on AI-driven productivity and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework provide useful context for leaders building a roadmap with controls.
Build vs. buy: a practical decision frame
- Data and access: Can you securely connect invoices, ERPs, card feeds, HR, vendors, and policy data without bottlenecks?
- Workflow depth: Do you have the integration muscle for approvals, exceptions, notes, and audit trails in your core systems?
- Controls: Can you enforce SoD, confidence thresholds, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints with clear logs?
- Model lifecycle: Who owns updates, testing, drift monitoring, and prompt/guardrail hardening?
- Total cost: Build (engineering, MLOps, security) vs. buy (licenses, implementation, change management).
- Vendor risk: Certifications, data residency, support SLAs, and exit options.
Rule of thumb: Build where you create clear competitive advantage. Buy for standard processes that value speed, reliability, and compliance out of the box.
ROI you can defend to the CFO
- Hours saved per document or transaction (and where those hours get reallocated).
- Cycle time reductions: intake-to-posted invoice, report-to-reimbursement, dispute-to-resolution.
- Straight-through processing rate and touch counts per case.
- Leakage caught: duplicate payments, out-of-policy spend, missed early-pay discounts.
- Compliance rate: policy adherence, receipt match, exception handling within SLA.
- Audit readiness: completeness of logs, fewer external audit findings.
Baseline these metrics before rollout, run dual for 2-4 weeks, and publish weekly deltas. If the numbers move, scale. If not, fix prompts, guardrails, or data access before expanding.
Implementation path that actually ships
- Pick one narrow, high-volume sub-process (e.g., non-PO invoice coding under $1,000).
- Codify policy as rules the agent can apply; define no-go zones and auto-approve thresholds.
- Start with human-in-the-loop on all actions; promote to auto for high-confidence cases.
- Instrument everything: confidence scores, reasons, actions taken, and override reasons by approver.
- Run a timeboxed pilot, compare to baseline, then expand to the next adjacent sub-process.
Risk, control, and audit essentials
- Security: SOC 2/ISO 27001, data encryption, PII redaction, least-privilege access.
- Governance: Segregation of duties, maker-checker controls, role-based approvals.
- Reliability: Guardrails, fallbacks, retry logic, and clear escalation paths.
- Observability: Prompt/version control, action logs, and immutable audit trails.
- Compliance: Data residency options, retention policies, and vendor SLAs aligned to your risk profile.
What AppZen's push signals
By highlighting education on agentic AI, build-versus-buy, and ROI, AppZen is betting operators want outcomes, not buzzwords. The emphasis on agents suggests where the company aims to stand out in finance automation. If customers convert the concepts into adoption and higher-value deployments, expect stronger retention and more pricing leverage over time.
Where to go from here
If you're evaluating agentic AI for finance ops, start with one use case, tie it to a metric you report today, and give the agent a clear policy to enforce. Keep humans in the loop until your confidence scores prove the case. Then scale with controls.
For structured learning and tool discovery, see curated resources for finance teams: AI tools for finance and AI courses by job. These can help your team move faster and avoid common mistakes.
Your membership also unlocks:
