AI in Wealth and Asset Management: Efficiency Gains Without Losing the Human Edge
AI is moving from buzzword to real utility in wealth and asset management. A recent EY global survey on generative AI in the sector points to meaningful efficiency and profitability improvements. That promise is clear, but so are the guardrails.
Alok Agrawal, Head - Quant and Fund Manager at Alchemy Capital Management, frames it well: AI is a tool. It surfaces a lot of data and analysis from across the internet, and it can summarise fast. But the outputs aren't always correct and need cross-verification. It's evolving quickly, and used right, it makes research and day-to-day work more efficient.
Anupam Tiwari, Head of Equity at Groww Mutual Fund, breaks decision-making into three steps: research and data collection, building a framework, and final decision-making. Current AI is most useful in the first two. Groww MF is already using AI for data collection and research, while also building models and frameworks to strengthen the middle step.
Where AI helps today
- Aggregating and cleaning large data sets, from filings to news and transcripts.
- Summarising company updates, sector trends, and analyst commentary into quick briefs.
- First-pass screens, anomaly flags, and idea funnels for analysts to review.
- Drafting research notes, meeting pre-reads, and management Q&A outlines.
- Scenario comparisons and base assumptions checks to stress-test a thesis.
Limits you should factor in
Investment isn't a single-variable problem. You need a clear framework and the discipline to follow it. AI can support the objective legwork, but it can't replace judgement, context, or accountability.
Short-term trading models can benefit from AI-driven signals and speed. For long-term investing, qualitative variables carry weight and the picture isn't black and white. As of now, AI isn't ready to make the final call.
A pragmatic adoption plan
- Define decision boundaries: what AI can draft or score, and what humans must approve.
- Build a clean data pipeline: sources, refresh cycles, entitlements, and audit trails.
- Establish a verification loop: cross-check AI outputs against filings, calls, and ground truth.
- Codify the research framework: prompts, checklists, and templates that mirror your IC process.
- Control model risk: log prompts/responses, monitor drift, and document known failure modes.
- Integrate compliance: recordkeeping, reproducibility, and disclosures baked into workflows.
- Track ROI: time saved per note, coverage expansion, hit rates, and cost per insight.
Metrics that keep you honest
- Research cycle time: days to draft to IC-ready.
- Coverage breadth: companies/sectors monitored per analyst.
- Fact accuracy: error rate in AI summaries vs. primary sources.
- Alpha attribution: contribution of AI-sourced insights to idea performance.
- Compliance pass rate: percentage of AI-assisted work cleared on first review.
Bottom line
Use AI to compress research time and widen coverage. Keep humans responsible for frameworks and final decisions. That mix respects the craft while capturing the efficiency gains on offer.
Further reading: see EY's perspective on generative AI in wealth and asset management for industry benchmarks and use cases. EY: How Gen AI is transforming WAM.
If you're building capability for your team, explore curated tools and training for finance professionals: AI tools for finance and AI courses by job.
Your membership also unlocks:
