AI tides shift harbour management
South Australia is moving ahead with smarter maritime operations. BMT has built a working prototype of its ADAPT platform under Phase 2 of the state-backed Deep Blue Project with the Department of Infrastructure and Transport (DIT SA). The goal: help harbour authorities make faster, cleaner decisions from the stream of environmental and operational data they already collect.
Instead of periodic surveys and siloed reports, the cloud platform blends inputs from autonomous vessels, metocean sensors, and machine-learning models. For managers, that means fewer blind spots, tighter control of risk, and clearer ROI on port assets.
What changes for port leaders
Ports have relied on snapshots of data to run a 24/7 operation. That creates lag, bigger buffers, and higher costs. A unified, real-time view flips the workflow from reacting after the fact to planning with confidence.
With ADAPT, data lands in one workspace and is turned into live insights you can act on: conditions, traffic, berth status, and predicted disruptions-all in one place.
Operational wins you can measure
- Real-time awareness: Live metocean conditions, vessel movements, channel depths, and berth availability in a single dashboard.
- Predictive planning: Models anticipate siltation, sea state, and weather windows to optimize dredging cycles and port calls.
- Alerts and playbooks: Threshold-based notifications with pre-agreed responses reduce decision time and inconsistency.
- Scheduling and dispatch: Smarter berth and resource allocation to cut waiting time, fuel burn, and overtime.
- Audit-ready evidence: Clear trails for safety, environment, and compliance-useful for regulators and insurers.
The platform can sit alongside VTS, AIS, maintenance, and ERP systems through APIs, so you don't need a full rip-and-replace. Access controls and data governance help keep operations and compliance aligned.
90-day rollout playbook
- Set outcomes: Agree on targets like "reduce average berth delay by 10%" or "cut weather-related cancellations by 15%."
- Run a data check: Map sources (AIS, tides, sensors, surveys). Fix latency and quality issues first.
- Start narrow: Pick two use cases-e.g., dredging windows and berth conflicts-and build the dashboards and alerts.
- Pilot in shadow mode: Compare platform guidance with current decisions for 4-6 weeks.
- Baseline and review: Track delays, fuel, overtime, and incident rates. Keep what works, drop what doesn't.
- Scale deliberately: Add more sensors, models, and teams after you've banked the first savings.
Risks to manage up front
- Data quality and latency: Bad inputs lead to bad decisions. Assign owners and SLAs for each feed.
- Model drift: Validate predictions monthly against reality; retrain on new seasons and traffic patterns.
- Cyber and cloud posture: Enforce least-privilege access, logging, and incident response drills.
- Human factors: Keep ops involved, update SOPs, and train supervisors on new alerts and playbooks.
- Vendor lock-in: Prefer open standards and exportable data so you can change course if needed.
Assign a product owner, set a weekly ops-tech standup, and publish a clear RACI. The clarity reduces friction and keeps momentum.
Why this matters now
Volatile trade, weather extremes, and tight labor make reactive management expensive. Even small gains in predictability compound across queues, fuel use, emissions, and safety.
If you're building AI capability for your ops and engineering leads, focused training shortens the learning curve. See role-based options here: AI courses by job.
For background on the public-sector partnership, visit DIT South Australia. To follow the platform's progress, see BMT's work in maritime innovation: BMT.
Your membership also unlocks:
