Actor Sues Albanian Government Over "AI Minister" Likeness: What Public Officials Should Learn
Anila Bisha, a well-known Albanian actor, has sued the government for using her face and voice to create "Diella," a virtual "AI minister" unveiled by Prime Minister Edi Rama last September. She says she granted permission to use her likeness for a citizen-services assistant, not for a cabinet-level persona. The government has rejected the claim as baseless and says it welcomes a court review.
The court will decide whether to order the government to stop using Bisha's image. She's seeking €1 million in damages, and her lawyer notes Albanian law allows penalties up to €21 million for personal-data violations by state institutions. Diella's image appears on the official government website alongside the prime minister and the deputy prime minister, who is separately contesting charges related to infrastructure tenders.
Why this matters for government teams
- Consent scope: Permission for one use (a helpdesk assistant) doesn't equal permission for another (a minister persona). Scope creep is a legal and reputational risk.
- Role misrepresentation: Presenting an AI avatar as a "minister" blurs lines between communication, automation, and authority.
- Personal data and likeness rights: Faces and voices are personal data. Misuse can trigger claims, injunctions, and significant fines.
- Public trust: Perception shifts fast. One misstep can frame an AI program as deceptive, even if the intent was efficiency or transparency.
- Operational exposure: Procurement, approvals, and records need to reflect AI-specific risks, not just standard media use.
Immediate actions if your agency uses AI avatars or voices
- Pause questionable deployments: If consent terms are unclear, stop distribution until legal review is complete.
- Verify consent chain: Confirm you have explicit, role-specific, written consent for image, voice, and any generative alterations-plus revocation terms.
- Label clearly: Disclose that an avatar is synthetic, its function, and who is accountable. Avoid titles that imply elected or appointed authority.
- Run a DPIA: Document purpose, data flows, storage, access controls, and safeguards for biometric data.
- Stand up a complaint path: Publish how people can report misuse or request removal. Track and resolve within set SLAs.
- Prep comms: If controversy hits, have a plain-language statement, the consent summary, and corrective steps ready.
Policy guardrails to prevent repeat incidents
- Consent is role-bound: Tie consent to a specific function, channel, audience, and duration. Any new use requires fresh consent.
- No official titles for synthetic personas: Use neutral labels (e.g., "Virtual Assistant") and disclaim authority boundaries.
- Rights management: Maintain a registry of all likeness and voice assets, contracts, expirations, and revocations.
- Audit and logs: Keep decision records for launches, changes, and takedowns. Review quarterly.
- Watermarking and traceability: Embed signals that an avatar is synthetic; publish verification guidance for the public.
- Escalation rules: High-visibility placements (homepages, press events) require senior legal and ethics approval.
Procurement checklist for AI avatars and voice systems
- Indemnities for likeness/IP claims and vendor liability caps aligned to public risk.
- Clear training-data disclosures and bans on training models on provided likeness beyond agreed scope.
- Deletion/retention SLAs for source media, embeddings, and model derivatives.
- Compliance with data-protection law, cross-border transfer controls, and accessibility standards.
- Insurance coverage, incident response timelines, and cooperation duties spelled out.
Context and next steps
Bisha says the fallout has included harassment and awkward public encounters, noting some people now address her as "Diella." The government disputes her claims and calls the case "nonsense," while indicating it's ready to settle the issue in court. However the ruling lands, the lesson is clear: AI communications in the public sector live or die on consent, clarity, and trust.
If your department is planning or operating an AI assistant, align with established data-protection principles and run a documented impact assessment. A concise primer on data protection rules is available from the European Commission's GDPR overview, which offers useful benchmarks even outside the EU context.
Build internal capability
Upskilling staff who scope, buy, and operate AI tools reduces avoidable mistakes. For structured learning paths by role, see this curated catalog:
Bottom line: Treat faces and voices as sensitive assets, lock down consent to the exact use, and never let a virtual assistant wear a title that suggests real-world authority.
Your membership also unlocks:
