Brazil's Data Protection Authority Backs National AI System Bill
Iagê Zendron Miola, director of Brazil's National Data Protection Authority (ANPD), voiced support for the government's bill to establish a national system to promote and regulate artificial intelligence.
For public-sector leaders, this signals momentum toward a clearer framework for AI oversight in Brazil-one that could tighten coordination across agencies, raise baseline safeguards, and give teams more certainty on what "good" looks like.
Why this matters for government teams
- Policy direction: Support from the ANPD's leadership suggests privacy and AI governance will be coordinated rather than siloed.
- Clarity for operations: A national system can standardize definitions, risk tiers, and documentation, reducing guesswork across ministries and state entities.
- Procurement confidence: Clearer rules help buyers specify requirements, vet vendors, and enforce compliance in contracts.
What to expect (based on common regulatory patterns)
- Risk-based obligations: Higher-risk AI use cases typically face stricter testing, transparency, and human oversight.
- Interagency coordination: Expect defined roles for the ANPD and sector regulators to reduce overlap and gaps.
- Sandboxes and pilots: Controlled trials may help agencies and vendors validate safeguards before full rollout.
- Alignment with LGPD: Data protection duties (lawful basis, minimization, DPIAs) will likely remain central.
Actions agencies can start now
- Inventory AI systems: List current and planned AI tools, purpose, datasets, model owners, and public impact.
- Classify risks: Flag use cases with legal, safety, biometric, or eligibility impacts for deeper review.
- Run DPIAs/AI assessments: Document intended use, potential harms, mitigations, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints.
- Tighten data governance: Verify data sources, consent/authority, retention, access controls, and audit trails.
- Procurement clauses: Require model documentation, evaluation results, incident reporting, and retraining obligations.
- Transparency: Publish plain-language summaries of AI use and avenues for redress and human review.
- Incident playbooks: Define triggers, response teams, and escalation paths for model errors or data issues.
Key questions to track in the bill
- Which authority will coordinate the national system, and how will it interact with the ANPD?
- How will "risk" be defined, and what obligations map to each tier?
- What rules will apply to government use of AI versus private-sector use?
- Will there be regulatory sandboxes for public entities and startups?
- What enforcement tools, timelines, and budgets are attached?
90-day preparation plan
- Appoint an AI lead: Give one accountable official cross-functional authority (privacy, security, legal, procurement).
- Draft a baseline policy: Define approval gates, documentation, testing standards, and human oversight.
- Pilot evaluation: Select one AI tool and run bias, performance, and security checks with a clear exit or rollout decision.
- Update contracts: Add data-use limits, evaluation access, uptime/support SLAs, and decommissioning terms.
- Upskill teams: Train analysts, buyers, and compliance staff on assessments, documentation, and monitoring.
Context and further reading
Helpful training resources
If you're standing up an AI governance program or updating procurement and compliance workflows, curated learning paths can speed things up.
Bottom line: With Iagê Zendron Miola backing a national AI system, agencies should move from ad-hoc pilots to structured governance. Get your inventory, risk framework, and procurement standards in place now so you can execute once the rules land.
Your membership also unlocks:
