Redefining load forecasting and management: how AI is making smart grids smarter
AI is stressing the grid and improving it at the same time. The load it introduces is hard to plan for. The forecasting accuracy it delivers is hard to ignore. That tension is pushing operators to test, learn and upgrade without losing control.
Utilities are already moving. AES runs an AI-enabled Smart Operation Centre. E.ON's Intelligent Grid Platform unifies grid data. National Grid is trialling AI-driven flexibility with Emerald.AI. Hydro-Québec has integrated AI into daily load forecasting after years of parallel testing.
Why legacy models are slipping
Traditional forecasting fits mathematical models to historic load curves. It works on normal days. It breaks when behavior shifts overnight. The pandemic made that clear; demand patterns flipped, and historic curves offered little guidance.
Now add volatile weather, more rooftop solar, AI data centers, and variable renewables. As David Adkins of National Grid notes, AI helps make sense of complex, multi-source data and supports dynamic management so intermittent wind and solar don't undermine stability.
What AI changes
AI learns from patterns hidden across smart meters, sensors, weather, and operations. It adapts as conditions move, closing the gap between forecast and reality-especially on the few days that matter most. That shift turns operations from reactive firefighting into prepared decision-making.
Importantly, AI complements established planning. It works best alongside market signals and human oversight. Keep the loop tight: model outputs, operator judgment, and clear fail-safes.
Hydro-Québec: lessons from deployment
Hydro-Québec started with a 2018 proof of concept on a single substation. It spent five years refining deep neural networks before production use in late 2023. By 2024, AI supported short-term (to 36 hours) and 10-12 day hourly forecasts based on meteorologists' inputs, plus 42-day hourly outlooks using "historic normal" weather values.
The utility still runs AI in parallel with non-linear, constraints-based legacy models (ENLSIP). When AI and legacy disagree, operators investigate. During a 22 May 2024 heatwave, an older legacy model missed an atypical load dip and required a 1,500 MW correction. The AI model anticipated the deviation.
The takeaway: AI pays off most on unusual days. As anomalies become more frequent and costly, the ROI compounds.
AI data centers as flexible load, not just new demand
AI training jobs can spike consumption without much warning. That's a challenge. It's also a flexibility resource if orchestrated correctly.
Emerald.AI's approach classifies data center workloads by priority, then flexes non-critical jobs in line with grid needs-ramping down by a defined MW, holding reductions, then ramping back up without "snapback." National Grid trialled this in December 2025 and will review results before broader rollout.
Implementation playbook for managers
- Start narrow: Pick one use case (short-term load forecasting or peak-event prediction) and one region. Define a clear success metric and a timeboxed pilot.
- Run in parallel: Operate AI next to your current model for six to twelve months. Compare errors daily and escalate discrepancies for human review.
- Build the data spine: Integrate smart meters, weather, outages, DER telemetry, and market signals into a unified, time-synced layer. Fix latency and data quality before scaling.
- Human-in-the-loop by design: Require operator confirmation for high-impact actions. Set guardrails on automated setpoints and dispatch.
- Plan for drift: Monitor feature stability and model error by segment (season, temperature bands, weekdays/holidays). Retrain on a schedule and after detected shifts.
- Stress test "unusual" days: Backtest on heatwaves, storms, and holiday periods. Track error at system peak and during steep ramps.
- Make flexibility real: Inventory flexible loads (including data centers), define response times and MW blocks, and codify no-snapback rules.
- Vendor strategy: Ask for model transparency, audit logs, explainability for high-impact recommendations, and clear SLAs.
- Security: Treat any AI orchestration layer as critical infrastructure. Segment networks and require least-privilege access.
Metrics that matter
- Forecast error (MAPE/WMAE) on peak and near-peak days
- Ramp prediction error (MW/min) and timing variance around ramps
- Operator interventions per week and time-to-resolution
- Discrepancy rate between AI and legacy forecasts, and how often AI is closer to actuals
- Flexible load delivered (MW), response time, and rebound profile
- Events averted: near-miss frequency and severity reductions
Risk and governance
- Model risk: Document training data, versions, and known limits. Maintain rollback plans.
- Data risk: Validate weather feeds and meter data freshness. Flag outages and sensor faults automatically.
- Automation risk: Keep humans in control for high-impact actions. Simulate before actuating.
- Third-party risk: Vet vendors for security posture, uptime history, and incident response.
Procurement checklist
- Integration: Connectors for AMI, SCADA, DERMS, markets, and weather providers
- Explainability: Clear rationale for forecasts and recommended actions
- Scenario support: What-if analysis for extreme weather, DER growth, and data center additions
- Performance: Latency, refresh rates, and degradation behavior under data loss
- Operations: Audit trails, role-based access, testing environments, and rollback
- SLAs: Accuracy targets on peak days, response times, and escalation paths
Ninety-day plan
- Weeks 1-2: Define scope, metrics, and governance. Select pilot region and data sources.
- Weeks 3-6: Stand up data pipelines, backtest AI vs. legacy, and instrument monitoring.
- Weeks 7-10: Parallel run in production shadow mode. Establish operator review rituals.
- Weeks 11-13: Decide on controlled automation for low-risk actions. Publish results and next-step roadmap.
FAQ
What does AI do in a smart grid, and why is it becoming essential?
AI processes large volumes of meter, sensor, weather, and operational data to improve forecasting and real-time control. It helps operators prepare for swings in demand and variable generation. With more renewables, more extreme weather, and new large loads like AI data centers, planning ahead is now non-negotiable.
How does AI improve load forecasting compared with traditional models?
Legacy models do well on routine days but can miss rare patterns. AI learns from broader data and adapts faster, which reduces costly errors on abnormal days. The goal is to pair both, then lean on AI where it consistently outperforms.
Can AI help prevent blackouts and improve reliability?
Yes-by improving preparedness. Better forecasts inform scheduling of generation, storage, and flexibility. AI can also recommend near real-time actions to stabilize frequency and balance supply with demand, with operators staying in control.
What can we learn from Hydro-Québec?
Test small, research deeply, and run models in parallel. Use discrepancies to guide human review. Expect AI to shine on unusual days-where the upside is measured in hundreds of megawatts and avoided emergencies.
How can AI data centers support flexibility instead of just adding demand?
By orchestrating non-critical workloads in response to grid signals. That means planned reductions, defined MW blocks, clear hold times, and controlled ramp-ups to avoid snapback. Trials with utilities show this is feasible.
Additional resources
Level up your team
If you're building internal capability for grid-focused AI projects, explore role-based training options here: Complete AI Training - courses by job.
Your membership also unlocks:
