The U.S. Is Losing Ground on Global AI Capacity-Building
While Washington debates process and posture, Beijing is executing. China rallied over 140 countries behind a U.N. AI capacity-building resolution and rolled out a Global AI Governance Action Plan. The result: momentum, meetings, and a growing coalition across Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania. Meanwhile, U.S. engagement is inconsistent, program status is unclear, and partners are moving on.
United Nations records show just how broad the support is for China's multilateral push. That should be a wake-up call.
What AI Capacity-Building Actually Means
- Talent: scholarships, technical training, and research programs that build local expertise.
- Compute: data centers, cloud credits, and affordable access to GPUs for universities and startups.
- Institutions: regulatory frameworks, standards, and accountable oversight with local participation.
- Technology transfer: models, toolchains, and partnerships that grow independent capability-without creating dependency.
Where China and Russia Are Moving Fast
- Workshops in Shanghai and Beijing with participants from 40+ countries, plus a standing Group of Friends on AI capacity-building.
- BRICS AI Alliance Network across 14 countries and formal China-Russia AI cooperation.
- Education pipelines: long-running scholarship programs and targeted AI programs that plug hard skills gaps.
- Infrastructure leverage: the Digital Silk Road, energy and mining ties, and bundled financing that accelerates delivery.
Where the U.S. Is Stalling
- Institutional whiplash: USAID digital programs shuttered or paused; State's Global AI Research Agenda non-operational; unclear status for the PGIAI.
- Overweight on hard infrastructure; underweight on upskilling and local research support.
- Export-first mindset: big on selling tech, light on building the human and institutional capacity required to use it well.
Why This Matters for U.S. Interests
- Legitimacy: Global AI standards and norms will be determined with or without U.S. input. Absence equals irrelevance.
- Security: Partners with real AI capability make steadier allies than those tied to adversarial infrastructure and governance models.
- Economics: Future AI users, builders, and markets are in the Global Majority. Pullback hands those markets to competitors.
The Cost of Withdrawal
China is already deploying AI in agriculture, health, and smart cities across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Governments are publicly endorsing Chinese governance initiatives and signing up for joint research facilities. This is not theoretical-these projects reset expectations and loyalties.
Recent U.S. efforts are mixed. A pay-for-performance health logistics deal could help, but the contracting burden may be unrealistic for debt-stressed governments. In contrast, equity in African-led infrastructure firms-paired with U.S. tech-builds local ownership, jobs, and technical depth. That model works.
What Authentic Partnerships Require
- Sovereignty first: support independent decision-making and local control over data, models, and operations.
- Talent pipelines: fund scholarships, faculty exchanges, and accredited training for researchers, auditors, and regulators.
- Accessible compute: cloud credits, regional GPU clusters, and shared facilities with fair access for universities and startups.
- Open, adaptable models: accelerate export of small-parameter, high-quality, open-source models suitable for local fine-tuning.
- Interoperable governance: co-develop standards with local regulators and civil society; enable auditability and public transparency.
- Stable financing: multi-year commitments insulated from political cycles; predictable grant and equity programs.
- Local ownership: invest in indigenous companies and consortia; avoid vendor lock-in; prioritize tech transfer.
A 24-Month Action Plan
- Stand up a Global Majority Compute Fund: pooled grants + cloud credits for universities and public-interest labs.
- Launch Regional AI Centers of Practice: Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America-each with training, applied research, and regulatory sandboxes.
- Publish a U.S. playbook for model access: approve exports of safe, efficient, small models; include documentation and evaluation kits.
- Fund AI auditor training: certify 1,000+ local auditors and regulators; pair with practical red-teaming programs.
- Back local firms: expand equity and debt financing for data centers, cloud providers, and AI startups that integrate U.S. tech.
- Institutional continuity: create statutory mandates and multi-year appropriations for international AI cooperation.
How to Measure Real Progress
- Compute access: number of researchers with GPU/TPU hours; cost per training run for public institutions.
- Talent: scholarships awarded, graduates placed, research outputs, and retention in local ecosystems.
- Local ownership: percent of infrastructure and IP controlled by domestic entities.
- Governance capacity: time-to-audit, number of certified auditors, enforcement actions taken.
- Interoperability: adoption of shared testing protocols and evaluation benchmarks across partner countries.
Course Correction Starts With Focus
The U.S. cannot expect countries to adopt American standards while offering no stable partnership, limited compute, and few training pathways. Countries want predictable funding, respect for sovereignty, and delivery. Offer that, or lose influence where it matters most.
If you're building practical skills pipelines for your team or agency, explore structured AI upskilling by role at Complete AI Training.
Bottom Line
Stop treating AI capacity-building as a talking point. Fund compute. Train people. Co-develop governance. Invest in local firms. And commit for the long haul. That's how the U.S. regains credibility-and a real voice-in the systems that will define this century.
Your membership also unlocks:
