AI video startup sparks backlash after bragging about cutting creative jobs
Higgsfield.ai, an AI video tool startup, set off a firestorm after posting that its motion design tech led clients to end "20+ creative jobs." The post was deleted, but artists noticed - and pushed back hard.
Aharon Rabinowitz, CEO of Motion Management, put it bluntly: "Celebrating the end of artists' careers (even when their motion design tools are not actually good enough to render anyone unemployed) is just super dumb and shortsighted." For a company selling to creators, cheering layoffs is brand suicide.
Why creators are upset
- It signals contempt for the people who make the product look good: you.
- It fuels a race to the bottom, where clients value cost over craft.
- It normalizes replacing skilled labor while using creators' portfolios to market the tool.
What critics allege about the product and marketing
For months, online critics have accused the company of practices that erode trust. These are allegations, not proven facts, but they're widespread:
- Bait-and-switch marketing - promises of "unlimited" access to third-party services like Google Nano Banana Pro followed by account limits or bans.
- Undisclosed review astroturfing to counter negative posts.
- Predatory billing and restrictive refund terms.
- Deceptive, explicit marketing used as rage bait.
- Commissioning promo content that allegedly uses unlicensed IP, shifting potential legal risk to customers.
One critic summarized the sentiment as "a company built on rage-bait content, stolen likenesses, and sexual exploitation." Accusations like these demand a clear, public response from any vendor.
How the service reportedly works
UK-based software tester and video maker Ian Hudson said the product appears to be "just a wrapper for other services." According to him, prompts get queued, delayed, and then routed to external models, such as Google Nano Banana or a service called Kling.
He said "unlimited" usage looked more like throttled trials with vague terms. "Either something's unlimited or it's not… it turns out it's not." He also criticized refund limits: if you try the tool, you allegedly lose eligibility - a setup that makes refunds nearly impossible.
Creators in community spaces echoed similar complaints: multi-hour wait times for short videos, censorship errors, outages, and marketing that promises more than the product delivers. As Hudson put it, controversial posts get published for attention, then deleted once the drama peaks.
The attention play
Internet veteran Robert Scoble said he spoke with someone behind an influencer push around the tool: "This guy is trying to capture attention in a world where none of us have any." Provocation gets clicks. But at scale, it also erodes trust - and trust is the only thing that keeps clients paying premium rates.
At the time of writing, the company had not offered a detailed public response to the claims reported and circulating online. Reports also noted a press email bouncing and a support email that auto-acknowledged messages without follow-up.
What you can do right now as a creative
Before you buy any AI tool, run this checklist
- Get the spec sheet in writing: usage caps, model sources, queue times, and content policies.
- Ask for a simple pricing table with concrete limits. No "unlimited" without defined fair-use thresholds.
- Test with low-stakes work. Time everything: upload-to-output, revision cycles, final render quality.
- Confirm refund terms and chargeback eligibility before paying. Screenshots matter.
- Clarify IP and licensing: who owns outputs, training rights, and commercial use. Ask for indemnity language.
- Look for a real support pathway: SLA, human escalation, and response times.
If a vendor refuses clarity, that's your signal. Complexity hides costs. Ambiguity hides risk.
Protect your client work and your name
- Disclose third-party AI usage in contracts. Require client sign-off for any model that touches their assets.
- Add an IP warranty clause with caps and vendor indemnity when possible.
- Keep an audit log: prompts, seeds, model versions, and outputs. It saves you in disputes.
- Maintain a fallback stack (second tool or manual pipeline) to hit deadlines if the service stalls.
Career move: rise up the stack
Tools compress production. They don't replace taste, judgment, or client trust. Shift your value to higher leverage layers:
- Creative direction and story systems.
- Brand consistency, taste, and editing decisions clients can feel.
- AI ops: prompt design, data prep, model selection, QA, and compliance.
- Client communication, expectation management, and ethical guidelines.
You'll be paid for outcomes, not keystrokes. That's durable.
Red flags to watch for
- "Unlimited" without precise limits.
- Heavy use of shock marketing and deleted posts.
- No named team, no legal docs, no roadmap.
- Queue times measured in hours, not minutes.
- Refunds denied after minimal use.
If you've been burned
- Document everything: invoices, screenshots, emails, error logs, and T&Cs.
- Escalate with your payment provider if refund terms were deceptive. See FTC guidance on truth-in-advertising and subscriptions here.
- Share a factual post (no speculation): what was promised, what happened, timestamps.
Level up your AI video stack (without risking your reputation)
Explore vetted generative video options and compare strengths, limits, and pricing. Start small, standardize what works, and build repeatable systems.
- Browse credible AI video tools with practical notes here.
- Find learning paths by job type to upskill without breaking your workflow here.
The takeaway
Attention hacks don't build long-term businesses - or careers. Treat AI as a tool that amplifies your taste, your systems, and your client results. Don't cheer job cuts. Build work clients would miss if you stopped tomorrow.
Your membership also unlocks:
