Insurers Hold Fire on AI Exclusions as D&O Market Waits for Claims Data
Directors' and officers' liability insurers are not yet imposing broad artificial intelligence exclusions on policies, but executives say it's only a matter of time. The consensus in the D&O market is that AI poses a genuine risk exposure, but one too poorly understood to rewrite policy language aggressively or restrict underwriting terms right now.
Instead, insurers are watching closely as banks and corporate clients experiment with AI internally. Large financial institutions are testing the technology extensively, while smaller and regional lenders remain uncertain how it fits into their operations.
Banks Moving Cautiously Into AI
Major household-name banks will likely embrace AI first, just as they did with digital currencies and other innovations. They have spent more time internally understanding how the metrics work compared to regional and community banks. The rest of the market will follow to stay competitive.
But hesitation runs deep. Nobody knows what the outcomes could be, and uncertainty around insurance coverage and regulation is holding companies back from large-scale deployment.
The concern sharpens when AI moves closer to customer interactions. Financial institutions are increasingly focused on liability implications of using AI in mortgage underwriting, customer service and decision-making tools.
That's where exclusions may accelerate. Losses will inevitably follow as with any emerging exposure, and carriers will say their policies cannot remain silent forever. When a policy is silent, legal precedent eventually determines whether something is covered.
AI-Washing Tops Underwriter Concerns
For now, the primary concern among underwriters is "AI-washing" - companies overstating the potential impact of artificial intelligence in public disclosures or investor communications. Some notable claims have involved companies with massive AI-driven valuations inflating expectations around the technology.
Insurers have considered whether AI underwriting questionnaires might become necessary, similar to those introduced for cyber or Y2K exposures decades ago. Carriers have largely resisted that step so far.
What underwriters are looking for is that companies are not being overly aggressive with AI disclosures. The volume of AI-washing claims is not overwhelming the market yet.
D&O Market Stabilizing, Capacity Still Abundant
The D&O market remains highly competitive even as conditions stabilize after years of falling prices. Insurers are deploying large amounts of capital at relatively modest premiums, particularly on large corporate towers where competition stays intense.
Public company D&O pricing in the first quarter was broadly flat, with rates rising by roughly one percent. That represents a significant shift from the steep declines of the previous three years.
Capacity remains abundant, particularly in higher-excess layers. Insurers are increasingly focused on profitability after years of aggressive competition eroded margins. New IPO activity is helping absorb excess capacity across aerospace, technology, retail and biotech sectors.
The Inevitable Shift
The parallel to early cyber insurance is instructive. Exclusions will likely emerge once claims trends become clearer and companies move from experimentation to large-scale deployment. Until then, insurers appear unwilling to move too aggressively.
For insurance professionals, the takeaway is straightforward: AI remains the largest unresolved question in corporate liability markets. Exclusions and specialized products are coming. The timing depends on when real claims data starts flowing in.
Understanding these dynamics now puts you ahead as policies begin to shift. AI for Insurance professionals can explore how these emerging risks are reshaping underwriting and claims practices across the industry.
Your membership also unlocks:
