U.S. Marines integrate Kodiak AI into ROGUE-Fires
The U.S. Marine Corps has awarded Kodiak AI a contract to integrate its autonomous "Kodiak Driver" system into the Remotely Operated Ground Unit for Expeditionary Fires (ROGUE-Fires) platform. The work supports testing of autonomous operations for distributed maritime missions and expeditionary force deployment in contested environments.
Key points
- Kodiak's dual-use autonomous driving software will be integrated into the Marine Corps' ROGUE-Fires carrier vehicle.
- Focus areas: autonomous movement, terrain routing, and mission execution across wide areas and contested terrain.
- Primary use cases align with distributed maritime operations, sea denial, and Indo-Pacific mission demands.
What ROGUE-Fires is built to do
ROGUE-Fires is a remotely operated ground vehicle intended to move, position, and support expeditionary fires across dispersed locations. It's built for sea denial and force projection where mobility, dispersion, and survivability matter most.
Think small teams, wide geography, and limited signature. The platform extends reach without tying down crews, especially in environments where contact, counter-reconnaissance, and jamming are expected.
What Kodiak brings to the platform
Kodiak Driver is an autonomous driving stack originally developed for commercial trucking. Integrating it into ROGUE-Fires introduces perception, route planning, and autonomy features to reduce operator load and enable more reliable movement under degraded conditions.
For operations leaders, this points to fewer crewed moves, better tempo in repositioning fires assets, and more predictable logistics windows-especially when comms are constrained and the unit must continue moving.
Why this matters for Operations
- Distributed employment: More nodes with fewer people. Autonomy helps reposition launchers and decoys without pulling Marines off higher-priority tasks.
- Survivability: Uncrewed movement in exposed areas reduces risk, supports deception, and complicates enemy targeting.
- Tempo and endurance: Automated route planning and obstacle handling can keep units mobile for longer cycles with less fatigue.
- Logistics flexibility: Opens the door for autonomous resupply runs to preplanned points or opportunistic staging areas.
- Comms discipline: Properly tuned autonomy reduces back-and-forth tasking traffic, which helps with signature control.
Operational watchpoints
- Comms-degraded behavior: Confirm how the vehicle executes loss-of-link logic, reroutes, and resumes tasks without constant supervision.
- Edge cases: Mud, soft sand, tight littoral roads, civilian traffic, and congested ports. Validate how autonomy handles them before deployment.
- Cyber and safety: Lock down update pipelines, sensor spoofing risks, and geofencing. Align with policy on autonomous and semi-autonomous systems.
- Interoperability: Ensure C2 integration with existing fires networks and position-location protocols to avoid blue-on-blue or route conflicts.
- Training and SOPs: Update TTPs for mission planning, abort criteria, recovery, and manual override. Designate clear crew roles for exception handling.
Metrics to track during testing
- Autonomy uptime and intervention rate per mission hour.
- Mean time to reroute under blockages or spoofed GPS signals.
- Fuel and battery efficiency across typical Indo-Pacific terrain sets.
- Comms bandwidth used per mission segment and signature impacts.
- Recovery time from loss-of-link and rate of safe stops versus mission completes.
Near-term implications
Expect initial use in controlled test ranges and exercise lanes that stress comms, deception, and rapid displacement of fires units. Early wins will likely be in reducing driver workload, shaving minutes off reposition timelines, and spotting where autonomy needs tighter guardrails before broader fielding.
Action steps for ops teams
- Define the first three missions where autonomy removes the most crew burden (e.g., routine repositioning, decoy placement, short-hop resupply).
- Pre-map feasible routes, dead-reckoning corridors, and deny/avoid zones to speed mission planning.
- Stand up a telemetry pipeline for after-action review: interventions, route changes, and sensor anomalies.
- Draft contingency checklists for jamming, GPS outages, stuck vehicle recovery, and manual takeover.
- Upskill planners and crews on AI-enabled ops and autonomy concepts to tighten your learning loop. If you need a structured path, see our AI courses by job role.
Policy note: Units integrating autonomy should align testing and employment with current guidance on autonomous and semi-autonomous systems. See DoD Directive 3000.09 for context here.
Bottom line: Integrating Kodiak AI into ROGUE-Fires aims to reduce operator load, keep fires mobile, and maintain tempo under pressure. If testing confirms reliability in comms-light and contested conditions, operations teams will gain new options for dispersing, masking, and sustaining combat power across wide areas.
Your membership also unlocks:
