Employers lag on AI governance despite widespread adoption
Artificial intelligence has become the top workplace policy concern for U.S. employers in 2026, surpassing immigration and diversity issues, according to a survey by law firm Littler Mendelson released Wednesday. More than half of respondents said they use AI in HR functions, yet most lack formal safeguards to manage the risks.
The shift in concern is striking. Expectations for AI-related regulatory changes roughly doubled compared to last year's survey. In 2025, fewer than half of employers anticipated such developments.
Adoption has accelerated. Only 6% of respondents said they use AI for no functions at all. Yet governance has not kept pace.
Governance gap widens despite improvements
Sixty-eight percent of employers now have formal AI governance policies, up from 38% in 2025. Littler called this progress "encouraging."
The gains mask deeper gaps. Fewer than half of organizations have procedures for vetting third-party AI vendors, tool-specific training programs, or an internal AI oversight committee. Niloy Ray, co-chair of Littler's AI and technology practice group, said employers are "still playing catch-up" on governance. "That mismatch could leave employers vulnerable to significant risk, especially given the complexity around compliance," Ray said.
Littler surveyed more than 300 C-suite executives, in-house lawyers, and HR professionals across the U.S.
Data privacy and bias top litigation concerns
Employers worry most about data privacy litigation involving employee and candidate information, along with videos and images processed by AI. Discrimination claims and state-specific regulations rank as secondary concerns.
These fears reflect real regulatory pressure. States and localities have increasingly restricted AI use in hiring, creating compliance headaches for national employers. The Trump administration has signaled it wants fewer state-level AI restrictions, adding uncertainty.
Job displacement fears overblown
Fifteen percent of employers have eliminated or plan to eliminate jobs due to AI. Sixty-three percent said they have not and are unlikely to do so.
More common are hiring slowdowns and job reassessments. Employers are reassigning responsibilities rather than cutting positions outright.
What managers need to know
Marko Mrkonich, also co-chair of Littler's AI and technology practice group, said employers need technical knowledge, business judgment, and compliance focus to manage AI's impact. Large employers have moved faster than smaller ones, but even they are in early stages of transformation.
The survey suggests that AI governance for management roles requires more than policy documents. Oversight committees, vendor reviews, and tool-specific training are essential. Organizations using AI in HR functions face particular pressure to demonstrate fair, compliant processes.
Employers that wait for regulations to clarify before acting risk both legal exposure and operational inefficiency. The old compliance playbook no longer applies.
Your membership also unlocks:
