The AI-powered lawyer: how law students are rewriting the legal curriculum
The legal sector doesn't change quickly. Yet AI has pushed it to move. At Universiti Malaya (UM), AI, legal tech, and student autonomy are no longer electives - they're the core. The outcome is a different kind of lawyer: process architect, data steward, and a skilled collaborator with machines.
Autonomy that compounds: students leading the learning
UM Law's student-run tech club, Justech, treats digital literacy as table stakes. They teach peers to code, work with structured legal data, and build simple automations that remove repetitive work. The intent is practical: create a shared baseline so teams can ship faster.
Students plan their own industry exposure. Recent visits to Google Malaysia focused on using AI tools like NotebookLM to turn research into structured, reusable knowledge. Next on their list: learning from one of Malaysia's largest e-commerce platforms to study scale, data flows, and operational speed.
Leadership matters. Justech's current and former directors - Lai Zhi Qing and Choo Yu Thong - set a clear pace: build, test, teach, repeat.
The creative core: the AI negotiation
In the professional year, faculty move past traditional drafting and into high-stakes generative AI work. Students learn prompt strategy for legal tasks - not to let a model "write the contract," but to guide the conversation so the output is legally sound and commercially sensible. Human judgment stays at the center.
- Draft faster, think deeper: Generate clause options that fit Malaysian law and business context, then refine. The first draft stops being a time sink.
- Review and redline at speed: Instruct AI to surface risk exposure, deviations from market positions, and pricing pressure points. The lawyer acts as strategic editor, not a proofreader.
This "AI negotiation" - the back-and-forth with a model - is a genuine legal skill. The payoff is clear: less manual grind, more strategic output per hour.
The holistic lawyer: thinking like an owner
Law Firm Management, delivered with legal tech specialist Lee Ji En of Chamberslab, treats the firm as a system. Students act as consultants solving urgent problems that partners feel every quarter.
- Problem A: Cyber-resilience - Build plans across People (training and drills), Process (incident response checklists), and Technology (MFA, endpoint protection, secure backups). The goal: keep client data safe and reduce downtime after an incident.
- Problem B: Workflow automation - Map the top three bottlenecks causing burnout and errors (version chaos, intake friction, manual data entry). Propose an integrated, off-the-shelf stack with clear time savings and risk reduction.
- Problem C: Digital marketing - Move beyond passive referrals. Define a 12-month plan with ICPs, primary channels (e.g., LinkedIn, firm blog), content cadence, and measurable funnel metrics.
- Problem D: Knowledge management - Stop losing know-how. Design KM across People (adoption incentives), Process (mandatory capture in workflows), and Technology (searchable, cost-appropriate storage). Make it easier to "find before redo."
What your firm can implement this quarter
- AI research SOP: A 5-step protocol for case summarisation, source validation, and citation checks. Treat AI outputs as drafts, not facts.
- Clause library + AI assist: Standardise positions, then use AI to adapt for facts and jurisdiction. Final review stays human.
- Redline checklist: Ask AI to flag liability caps, indemnity scope, termination triggers, pricing mechanics, and governing law. You decide the trade-offs.
- Baseline cyber controls: Enforce MFA, password manager, encrypted backups, and quarterly phishing simulations. Document response roles.
- One-week workflow audit: Track time on intake, drafting, revision loops, and sign-off. Fix the longest loop first with simple automation.
- Monthly KM sprints: After major matters, capture playbooks, templates, and lessons learned. Review adoption every quarter.
- Consistent marketing rhythm: Weekly LinkedIn posts, monthly insights from matters (anonymised), and a quarterly webinar aligned to your practice area.
Why this model matters
UM Law's approach blends technical skill, commercial sense, and human leadership. Students don't wait for permission - they build skills, test tools, and improve processes that firms care about. That mindset is what clients hire.
If you want to upskill your team on prompt strategy and applied AI for legal work, see this practical collection of training resources: Prompt Engineering Resources.
The future of legal work isn't abstract. It's here, it's measurable, and it's being built by students who treat AI like a colleague - and the firm like a system to improve.
Your membership also unlocks:
