U.S. Government Considers Buying Stakes in Major AI Companies
The U.S. government is exploring whether to take equity stakes in leading AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, a proposal that has drawn backing from both Senator Bernie Sanders and President Donald Trump. Senior officials held preliminary discussions with major AI companies about voluntary share transfers, according to reporting on the talks that included OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
Sanders published an op-ed last week advocating for the government to acquire 50% stakes in large AI companies through a sovereign wealth fund. He said the move would give the public a say in the technology's future and direct profits toward workers displaced by automation.
Trump expressed openness to the concept. "There's something very interesting about it, where it almost becomes a partnership with the American public," he told reporters. He added that he has considered government investment in AI companies for over a year and noted that he and Sanders share economic common ground.
The administration has already moved in this direction with other sectors. It took a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel last year, invested in rare-earth firms, and acquired stakes in quantum computing companies including IBM last month.
Precedent and Uncertainty
Government ownership has not harmed Intel's market performance. Since the 10% stake was acquired in August, Intel's stock has quintupled, turning a $10 billion investment into $50 billion in value.
But questions remain about how government ownership might affect business operations and investment. Some worry that state stakes could deter private capital, politicize AI governance, or expose taxpayers to underperforming investments. Others argue that government ownership signals these companies are too big to fail.
The Sanders proposal raises a larger question: if AI and quantum computing are treated as vital to national security, could they eventually become state-run utilities?
National Security and Global Competition
Government control of strategic industries has gained appeal in recent years amid supply chain disruptions, trade tensions, and security concerns. Cornell Professor Nicholas Mulder describes the current period as the fourth wave of nationalizations in a century, with governments acquiring half a trillion dollars in assets worldwide since 2020.
Former IMF chief economist Ken Rogoff warned that governments failing to secure a place in the AI supply chain risk mass job displacement without the tax revenue or capacity to manage the fallout. "No one really knows what such a world would look like, let alone how to keep it from tearing itself apart," he wrote.
The uncertainty may push governments from regulating AI to owning a stake in it. For government officials evaluating policy options, understanding AI for Government and the strategic implications of ownership versus regulation has become essential. Decision-makers should also consider how AI investments fit into broader AI for Executives & Strategy frameworks.
Your membership also unlocks:
