Early Dynamics of Journalism and Generative AI
In early conversations with a veteran news executive, the phrase “a long, strange trip” aptly described the decade-long interactions between journalism and technology companies. This turbulent phase marks the latest chapter in what’s been called the "post-platform era." Over the years, many tech initiatives aimed at news organizations failed due to misguided strategies, incompatible business models, and inadequate financial support tied to restrictive conditions.
True innovation has largely come from within newsrooms themselves, as they’ve sought to protect editorial integrity and build sustainable models. Nonprofit newsrooms emerged partly because of Alphabet and Meta's dominant hold on advertising revenue, while direct-to-consumer channels like newsletters and podcasts gained traction as social platforms deprioritized or even removed news content.
From Social Media Era to Post-Platform Reality
The Tow Center for Digital Journalism has tracked this shifting landscape since 2015. Their 2019 report, “The End of an Era,” highlighted publishers’ growing skepticism toward the assumption that journalism’s future depended on audience targeting through platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Google. Instead, the focus shifted to cultivating direct relationships with audiences via owned-and-operated channels such as newsletters, apps, and websites.
This change came after the “Death of the Homepage” phase around 2014, when social media’s dominance seemed to render publisher websites obsolete. The homepage has since found new life as a tool to engage loyal readers directly, signaling a broader strategic pivot.
Tech Giants’ Retreat from Journalism
Google and Meta, once heavily invested in journalism through initiatives like the Google News Initiative and Facebook Journalism Project, have scaled back or exited these spaces. Their initial billion-dollar commitments coincided with growing regulatory pressures globally.
Facebook notably reduced resources for its News tab and newsletter platform, shuttered Instant Articles, and ceased licensing deals. It also blocked news content in Canada and Australia in response to government regulations. Similarly, Google paused news licensing in California amid legislative proposals, cut its news division, and paused expansion of its news initiatives.
Twitter’s takeover by Elon Musk led to moves hostile to news organizations, including costly verification changes, labeling reputable news outlets as “state-affiliated media,” and throttling link speeds to major news sites.
The Rise of AI-Driven Disruptors
As traditional platforms retreated, new players emerged, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape information access. Companies like Perplexity and OpenAI launched AI-powered search and conversational tools designed to provide instant, verifiable answers by scanning the internet.
OpenAI’s ChatGPT-3, launched in late 2022, quickly gained 100 million active users, outpacing TikTok and Instagram's early growth. This surge prompted Google to declare a “code red” and spurred Microsoft to integrate OpenAI’s technology into Bing and Edge.
Generative AI’s Influence on Journalism
Generative AI intersects with journalism primarily in two areas. First, newsrooms use AI tools for tasks like data analysis, content reformatting, translation, headline generation, and drafting. Second, and more controversially, AI companies have trained their models on large datasets that include published journalism, often without permission.
This has led to generative search products that summarize news content directly on their platforms, reducing referral traffic to original publishers. For example, Perplexity offers concise answers with citations, eliminating the need to click through multiple sources.
Data shows sharp declines in referral traffic from traditional search engines, especially Google, which is expanding AI summaries within its search results. Generative AI platforms currently contribute minimally to direct news site visits, with some reports indicating a 95.7% drop in click-through rates compared to traditional search.
Challenges Around Content Use and Licensing
AI companies’ reliance on news content has reignited debates about copyright and intellectual property. News organizations argue that AI companies have appropriated their work without consent or compensation. High-profile lawsuits, like The New York Times’ case against OpenAI and Microsoft, exemplify this tension.
Some publishers have negotiated licensing or revenue-sharing agreements with AI companies, but many remain on the sidelines. Meanwhile, AI and tech giants lobby for legal changes to ease copyright restrictions on training data, seeking broad rights to use publicly available content without payment.
Microsoft, despite its collaborative stance with publishers, faces multiple lawsuits alleging copyright infringement related to AI training. This duality reveals the complex and often contradictory approaches major tech firms take toward journalism.
Current State and Outlook of Platform-Publisher Relations
Despite the troubled history, news organizations recognize the necessity of engaging with platforms, as audiences continue to reside there. Publishers emphasize the importance of owning their audience relationships to avoid the pitfalls of “renting” attention on platforms that can change rules or vanish overnight.
One news executive reflected on past mistakes: much audience growth occurred on platform-controlled spaces, leaving publishers vulnerable when access was revoked. Today, publishers balance the need to be present on platforms with efforts to strengthen direct audience connections.
This evolving relationship is shaped by lessons from the past but also faces new challenges and uncertainties brought by generative AI. The next phase will depend on how publishers and tech companies navigate issues like content rights, revenue sharing, and audience engagement.
Looking Ahead
The AI era in journalism is just beginning, and its full impact remains uncertain. Early signs suggest it will reshape not only how news is produced and consumed but also how publishers and platforms interact. Greater collaboration and thoughtful negotiation around intellectual property and financial models will be crucial.
For executives and strategists, understanding these shifts is vital. Building resilient, audience-first models while engaging cautiously but proactively with AI and platform technologies will define sustainable journalism in the years ahead.
For more insights on AI’s impact on industries and strategies to adapt, explore Complete AI Training’s courses for executives.
Your membership also unlocks:
