The University of Chicago Law School will ban phones and computers from first-year classrooms starting this fall, requiring students to take notes with pen and paper. The rule is part of a broader AI strategy statement the university released this week, signaling a deliberate step back from technology at the very moment law schools nationwide are racing to integrate generative AI into their curricula.
Dean Adam Chilton described the move as a direct response to the risk that AI shortcuts undermine foundational legal reasoning. "We want to ensure that our students are learning to think for themselves in a rigorous, critical way without relying on shortcuts through AI that might get them a quick answer but actually slow down the learning process," Chilton said.
A dual-purpose policy
Chilton stressed that the technology ban is not a rejection of AI. Upper-level courses and legal clinics will incorporate AI tools deliberately, and the school aims to produce graduates who can use new technology efficiently. "At the same time we want to produce graduates that can go into the world knowing how to use new technology in the most efficient way possible," he said.
The policy applies only to the law school for now, but Chilton framed it as a starting point for a larger conversation. "It takes an honest conversation about how we can ensure students at every level are capable of thinking without machines but also think with machines," he said.
How other institutions are responding
The UChicago announcement lands as K-12 districts and universities across Illinois tighten their own AI rules. Responses vary sharply by age group and institution type:
- Chicago Public Schools blocks certain AI products from its network and maintains an acceptable use policy and guidebook. Students must cite any AI use in their work and describe how they used it; failure to do so is a conduct violation.
- The Chicago Teachers' Union recently passed a resolution demanding a ban on student-facing AI in elementary classrooms and AI chatbots that simulate human relationships for students under 16. The resolution also calls for protecting student data under FERPA and ensuring no educator is forced to use AI tools or feed student data into them. CTU Financial Secretary Dr. Diane Castro said the resolution "draws a clear line between AI as a tool and AI as a replacement for teaching."
- The University of Illinois at Chicago requires students to acknowledge the school's code of conduct before using any AI tools.
- The Illinois State Board of Education released new guidance this week, providing a framework for how schools can thoughtfully integrate AI into teaching, learning, and operations while keeping educators central and prioritizing student development.
The University of Chicago's move arrives as the state board's guidance pushes for a more structured approach to AI for Education, a sign that policymakers and institutions are moving past ad-hoc responses toward formalized strategies.
Why this matters for educators
UChicago's ban is not a Luddite retreat. It is a calculated sequencing choice: build the cognitive muscles first, then layer on the tools. For K-12 educators, the lesson is that clear phase gates - where AI is off-limits, where it is permitted with citation, and where it is actively taught - can reduce confusion and academic integrity disputes. The CTU resolution shows that many teachers want those gates drawn firmly in early grades, where relational teaching and developmental safeguards matter most.
At the same time, the state board's guidance signals that schools will need staff who can model effective AI use, not just police it. Educators looking to build their own skills with classroom AI tools can explore an AI Learning Path for Teachers that covers practical integration strategies without sacrificing the teacher's central role. The institutions that get this balance right will be the ones that treat AI policy as a teaching decision, not just a technology decision.
Your membership also unlocks:
