Wake County Schools to Roll Out AI Policy and Teacher Training by Fall
Wake County Public Schools will train teachers on generative AI and approve a district-wide policy for its use by August, pending a school board vote. The move comes as education leaders nationwide struggle with how to teach students about the technology while maintaining academic integrity.
The school board has debated the policy for more than a year but hasn't discussed it since October. Most North Carolina school districts rely on stock language from the state school boards association, which recommends training for staff and students but leaves specifics to internal guidance documents that aren't public.
Wake is attempting a more detailed approach. The draft policy commits to generative AI literacy, safeguards for use, and keeping humans at the center of learning. It doesn't, however, specify what those safeguards are, when AI use would be appropriate, or how inappropriate use would be detected.
Board Members Want Concrete Guidance
During a policy committee meeting, board members pushed for more specific language about ethical use and how guidelines would differ by grade level. Some also raised concerns about moving forward without understanding broader implications of AI in academic settings.
"You have to learn to do the math first before the calculator," board member Cheryl Caulfield said, worrying that teachers would face the same classroom management challenges with AI that they recently overcame with cellphones.
Superintendent Robert Taylor acknowledged the tension. "The quest is always to be proactive and think about how we teach kids to use [AI] productively and effectively," he said, noting that technologies often become widespread before their full impact is understood.
Internal Guidelines Remain Hidden
Wake has developed internal guidance that discourages teachers from using AI detectors to grade student work-a practice the state Department of Public Instruction warns against because the tools produce high rates of false positives and false negatives. But students and teachers don't know this guidance exists.
Board member Chris Heagarty noted that a student challenging an AI detector grade would have no public policy to reference. "If a student brought a concern about an AI detector being used to grade their work, they would have no public-facing policy to reference," he said.
Wake's approved AI tools for students include Adobe Express, Canva, and Google Gemini (for ages 13 and older). Staff can also access Notebook LM, MagicSchool, and Khanmigo Teacher for lesson planning and assignment generation.
The district has not released its full internal guidance documents to the public, though it provided a list of approved tools.
Why Public Clarity Matters
Student Eleanor De Coster Canina started a petition last month after a teacher gave her a zero on an essay flagged by an AI detector. Her case highlighted why written policy matters: without public guidance, students have no recourse when teachers apply rules inconsistently.
The district told local media that "teachers must be able to accurately assess student work" while ensuring "that student work is evaluated fairly and consistently." That commitment now needs to move from internal memos to public policy.
For educators navigating these decisions, understanding both the capabilities and limitations of generative AI tools is essential. AI Learning Path for Teachers offers practical guidance on classroom implementation, while AI for Education covers broader policy and strategy considerations.
Your membership also unlocks:
