Federal AI Framework Leaves Healthcare Entities in Regulatory Limbo
The White House released a National Policy Framework for AI on March 20, 2026, that calls for federal preemption of state AI laws. But Congress has not acted yet, leaving healthcare organizations caught between existing state rules and a framework that exists only as a proposal.
The framework addresses six key objectives and explicitly asks Congress to preempt state laws that impose "undue burdens." It builds on a December 2025 executive order calling for uniform federal AI policy. Healthcare entities need to understand what this means for their current operations and compliance obligations.
State Laws Remain in Effect
No federal legislation has passed. The Utah AI Act, Colorado AI Act, and California's AI amendments to its consumer privacy law all remain active and binding.
The executive order directed the Department of Commerce to evaluate existing state AI laws and identify which ones conflict with federal policy. That evaluation was due March 11, 2026, but has not been released. Healthcare organizations should monitor for its publication.
States are likely to challenge any future federal preemption in court. This creates uncertainty about whether state laws will ultimately be overridden, and for how long healthcare entities must comply with multiple jurisdictions.
Protections for Minors Get Priority
The framework's first objective is "protecting children and empowering parents." Healthcare organizations that use AI tools with minors-such as mental health chatbots, pediatric practices, and children's hospitals-should review how they deploy and govern these systems.
Federal Agencies Will Continue Oversight
The framework explicitly rejects creating a new federal AI regulator. Instead, existing agencies will oversee AI in their sectors. Healthcare AI will remain under the jurisdiction of CMS, the DOJ, and the FDA, among others.
This means the current patchwork of overlapping federal oversight will likely continue. Healthcare organizations already managing compliance across multiple agencies should expect this pattern to persist.
AI Adoption Gets Encouragement
The framework emphasizes deploying AI and suggests that organizations using these tools may receive additional regulatory flexibility and enforcement discretion. Healthcare companies developing or implementing AI solutions could benefit from a more permissive regulatory environment under the current administration.
What Healthcare Organizations Should Do Now
Congress may not act quickly. Midterm elections occur later in 2026, which typically slows legislative momentum. Healthcare entities should monitor proposed federal legislation and track their obligations under existing state laws.
Organizations treating or serving minors should prioritize reviewing their AI governance practices. Those developing AI solutions should document how their approaches align with the framework's principles to position themselves for potential regulatory benefits.
For more on AI for Healthcare and AI for Legal compliance, review current guidance from your regulatory bodies and legal counsel.
Your membership also unlocks:
