Complete AI Training
Sign inGet my AI kit

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

AI agent for biomedical engineers

Risk File Update Agent

A risk file that matches the current design and field experience

Risk File Update Agent: what goes in, what the agent does and what you get

What it does

The risk management file for a medical device should always reflect the current design and real-world data, but it often lags. When a design change is approved or quarterly field data arrives, this agent finds the hazards, failure modes and controls linked to the changed parts or reported failures. It compares field failure rates with the probabilities assumed in the analysis. It drafts updated ratings and lists any control that is removed or changed. It then checks that every control has current verification evidence on file. Gaps are listed with owners, and the agent rechecks when evidence arrives. The engineer approves every change to the risk file. Edge case: a design change that removes a control is flagged even if the hazard rating would not change on paper.

How it works

Follow the arrows from top to bottom. The orange dashed arrow is the loop: when a check fails, the agent goes back and tries again.

Start and resultWhat it doesA check on its own workWaits for your OKGoes back and retries
Yes, continueApprovedNo 1 STARTS WHEN Design change approved or quarterly data arrives 2 USES A TOOL Find linked hazards, failure modes and controls 3 DOES Compare field rates with assumed probabilities 4 DOES Draft updated ratings and control changes 5 USES A TOOL Check verification evidence for each control 6 CHECKS THE RESULT Does every control have current evidence? If not: list missing evidence with owners. Back to step4. 7 YOU APPROVE Engineer approves risk file updates 8 RESULT Risk file and summary updated
Read the steps as a list
  1. Design change approved or quarterly data arrives
  2. Find linked hazards, failure modes and controls
  3. Compare field rates with assumed probabilities
  4. Draft updated ratings and control changes
  5. Check verification evidence for each control
  6. Does every control have current evidence?If not: list missing evidence with owners. Back to step 4.
  7. Engineer approves risk file updatesThe agent waits here for your OK.
  8. Risk file and summary updated

How it decides

It flags hazards tied to changed parts, failure modes where field rates exceed assumptions, and controls without current evidence.

  • Flag field rates above the assumed probability
  • Flag any removed or changed control
  • Require evidence for each control before closing

Make it yours

Every agent is a starting point. You choose these settings for your own situation.

  • Rating scales
  • Field data sources
  • Review frequency
  • Evidence age limit

What keeps you in control

It always asks you first

  • Changing risk ratings
  • Accepting residual risk

Hard limits

  • Never changes ratings without approval
  • Keeps a full change history

It stops when

  • Done: risk file updated
  • Stop: field data incomplete; ask quality

Set it up

We guide you through the set-up, step by step

Members get the full set-up guide for this agent. No technical skills needed: you copy, paste and upload.

10 minto set it up in your AI
5 AIsChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, Grok
  • One set of instructions to paste into your AI, with the clicks for ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Gemini and Grok
  • The agent then walks you through connecting your own data, one source at a time
  • A downloadable copy with the flow chart, the rules and the full guide
Get access to this agent

An example run

What happensQuarterly data in October showed a connector failure rate of 0.09%, three times the assumed 0.03%. The agent drafted a higher probability rating. The evidence check failed: the strain relief control had test evidence only for the old cable. It listed the gap for the test lead, who filed a new report two weeks later. The recheck passed, and the engineer approved the risk file update.

More agents for biomedical engineers