AI at Work in 2025: HR's Trust Gap to Close
AI is gaining traction in organizations, but employees still aren't sure what it means for them. More than half of employees (55%) say AI is positive for their organization, yet only 22% feel good about its impact on their own role.
On the employer side, usage has surged: 34% are using AI and another 49% are exploring it. Momentum is real. Alignment isn't-yet.
What the survey says
- 83% of employers using or exploring AI are focusing on text- and data-heavy processes (up from 63% last year).
- 30% of employers say AI will let them reduce staff and cut costs.
- Expected benefits: workflow efficiency (74% vs. 50% in 2024), HR/benefits communications (50% vs. 44%), and recruitment screening (59% vs. 67%).
- Employee sentiment: positive for the organization (55%), but far less so for their own job (22%).
How employers are using AI right now
"For us it frees up talent to do other things, not necessarily reduce it," said Bryan Crisp, HR operations manager at Niagara Casinos. The team is using Microsoft Copilot and tightening guardrails around confidential data, with clear communication on expectations and policy.
Corus Entertainment put a governance council in place to review each use case, noted Aastha Juneja, head of compensation and benefits. Employees submit a form to propose tools or use cases; the council reviews from legal and technical angles, with a sharp focus on copyright and IP.
Where employees need clarity
Transparency is the first gap. Students want employers to be explicit: Is AI tracking my behavior? Is it part of performance evaluations? While 63% of students say this kind of clarity would strongly influence employer attractiveness, only 30% of employers provide it today.
The second gap is perceived importance. In one survey, 66% of employers said AI is strategically important. Only a third of students believed their employers thought so. As David Drewery of the University of Waterloo's Work-Learn Institute put it, both sides care-neither side fully sees the other's plan.
HR action plan to close the gap
- Publish a plain-language AI policy. Spell out approved tools, data rules, human oversight, and how (or if) AI factors into performance, hiring, and monitoring.
- Stand up a governance council + intake form. Simple form, quick SLA, and checklists for privacy, IP, security, bias, and records retention.
- Pick the right use cases first. Start with text/data-heavy tasks: policy drafting, job ads, interview summaries, knowledge base updates, benefits FAQs.
- Set guardrails before rollout. Limit data access, turn off training on internal content, and log prompts/outputs for audit with clear retention windows.
- Train managers and employees. Cover prompt basics, privacy, review standards, and when human sign-off is required. For structured upskilling, see these AI courses by job.
- Redesign roles instead of defaulting to cuts. Shift effort from repetitive tasks to customer support, quality, analytics, and coaching.
- Refresh hiring and screening practices. Document AI use, test for bias, and keep human checkpoints for high-impact decisions.
- Communicate like crazy. Create an AI FAQ, publish change logs, and give employees a private channel to ask questions or flag issues.
- Use a risk framework. Align with recognized models such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
- Measure and iterate. Track productivity, quality, time-to-fill, employee sentiment, and incidents. Review monthly.
Practical notes from the field
Niagara Casinos is testing AI while tightening data controls and policy communication-good model for HR. Corus' use-case review council is another smart move: quick intake, central oversight, and strong IP discipline.
Both approaches reduce risk and build trust. They also make it easier to scale wins across teams.
Metrics HR should track in 2025
- Adoption rates by team and tool usage frequency
- Cycle-time cuts on target workflows (e.g., policy drafts, job postings)
- Quality KPIs: error rates, compliance findings, customer/internal satisfaction
- Transparency score: % of employees who can explain how AI is used in their work
- Training completion and assessment pass rates
- Incident reports and time to resolution
- Hiring metrics: time-to-fill, candidate experience, bias checks
Bottom line
AI adoption is up. Trust lags. HR can close the gap with clear policy, visible governance, job redesign, and real training. Start with the workflows that are easy to improve, make the rules obvious, and show people how this helps their day-to-day work.
If your teams need structured learning paths to get moving faster, explore practical AI courses for common HR and business use cases.
Your membership also unlocks:
