AI-Generated Brand Content Faces Copyright and Trademark Liability in Ghana and Beyond
Brands using generative AI to create advertisements, logos, and marketing copy now operate in legal territory where ownership is unclear, liability is distributed across multiple parties, and regulations are still being written. For legal professionals advising brand owners, the risks are immediate and concrete.
A U.S. court ruled in 2025 that AI companies can use legally purchased materials for training under fair use, but cannot use pirated books. Anthropic settled a copyright case for $1.5 billion and agreed to destroy pirated datasets. A UK court found that AI developers can be held liable for trademark infringement when they exercise sufficient control over their systems' outputs-including the ability to flag prohibited prompts and filter results.
Copyright Protection Does Not Extend to AI-Alone Creations
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in March 2026 that works generated solely by artificial intelligence, without significant human creative contribution, cannot be copyrighted. This means logos, advertising copy, and product descriptions produced exclusively by AI will not receive copyright protection.
However, courts are increasingly receptive to output-based infringement claims. If an AI system reproduces existing copyrighted material, the developer or brand using that system can be held liable even if the AI's output itself cannot be copyrighted.
The practical consequence: brands must document human creative input for any AI-assisted work. Relying solely on AI generation for core brand assets creates legal exposure.
Trademark Liability Extends to AI Developers
A temporary injunction against OpenAI illustrates trademark risk. Cameo, a platform for celebrity videos, sued after OpenAI introduced a "cameo" feature in its Sora video app. The court found a likelihood of consumer confusion and blocked OpenAI from using the name.
In the Getty Images case, a UK court held Stability AI liable for trademark infringement because the company exercised sufficient control over its training materials, output filtering, and user prompts. The court determined that technical autonomy does not exempt AI developers from responsibility.
Watermarks matter legally. Getty secured a narrow ruling on trademark infringement after the company demonstrated that Stability AI reproduced proprietary watermarks in generated outputs.
Liability Can Fall on Developers, Brands, or Platforms
An AI developer faces liability if it controls training data, can flag prohibited prompts, filters outputs, prevents users from controlling core model behavior, and is perceived by consumers as the originator of content.
Brands and advertisers face immediate risk from their own AI-generated advertisements. AI-generated content that mimics real endorsers, celebrities, or testimonials may breach consumer protection laws and advertising codes in Ghana.
The European Union's AI Act requires explicit disclosure of AI-generated advertisements. Article 50 mandates that synthetic media be disclosed clearly and distinguishably. Non-compliance carries fines of €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover.
A Guess advertisement in Vogue's August 2025 print edition featured an AI-generated model with only a discreet disclaimer. If circulated in Europe, the brand could face enforcement action even though the creative work originated outside the EU.
Ghana's Regulatory Framework Is Taking Shape
Ghana has no dedicated AI statute yet, but policymakers are moving quickly. The Ghana AI Practitioners' Guide, introduced in September 2025, sets out principles for ethical AI development adapted to Ghana's context.
Two bills are in progress. The Emerging Technologies Bill would establish an Emerging Technologies Agency with a specialized AI Division. The Data Protection Bill would repeal the current Data Protection Act and address AI systems, automated decision-making, cross-border data transfers, and deepfakes.
Ghanaian courts lack precedent on AI-generated content that breaches copyright or trademark law. Courts will likely look to foreign decisions for guidance until local case law develops.
In Nigeria, the Advertising Regulatory Council has warned digital marketers about fraudulent AI-generated advertisements with deceptive health claims. Kenya, South Africa, and Rwanda are developing their own AI initiatives.
Practical Steps for Brands Using AI
Document human creative contribution. Ensure that AI-assisted works include human input. Do not rely solely on AI generation for core brand assets.
Monitor training data. Regularly review whether your copyrighted materials are being used to train AI models without authorization. Issue takedown requests where appropriate.
Clear trademarks before deployment. Perform comprehensive trademark clearance for all AI-generated brand names, slogans, and logos.
Disclose AI-generated content prominently. Clearly identify AI-generated advertisements to consumers. Disclosures must be visible, not buried in fine print or corner disclaimers.
Update vendor contracts. Assign liability for intellectual property infringement resulting from AI-generated outputs to the appropriate party-developer, agency, or platform.
Monitor regulatory developments. Track progress on Ghana's Emerging Technologies Bill and Data Protection Bill. Prepare for potential requirements to register AI systems with the Emerging Technologies Agency.
Avoid misleading consumers. Do not use AI-generated content that misrepresents authenticity, endorsements, or product performance.
The Legal Principles Remain Stable
Existing laws-copyright, trademark, contract, and consumer protection-remain fully applicable to AI-generated content. AI does not create exemptions from these laws. It introduces additional channels through which infringement can occur.
Brands that document human contributions, review AI outputs for intellectual property violations, and provide clear disclosures can reduce legal exposure while maintaining consumer trust.
For AI for Legal professionals, understanding the liability chain and disclosure requirements is essential. Paralegals assisting with compliance can benefit from understanding AI Learning Path for Paralegals to support document review and infringement analysis.
Your membership also unlocks:
