Former travel writers test AI trip planning across France, find it 80% accurate on big decisions but unreliable on details

Two former travel writers tested AI trip planning across France and found it about 80% accurate. Gemini and Perplexity nailed the route and cities but got hours, menus, and one wine tasting completely wrong.

Categorized in: AI News Writers
Published on: Jun 05, 2026
Former travel writers test AI trip planning across France, find it 80% accurate on big decisions but unreliable on details

Former Travel Writers Test AI on France Trip, Find It 80% Accurate

Two former travel writers who left the industry over AI content flooding search results have completed a deliberate experiment: they let AI plan an entire trip across France, then graded what worked and what failed.

Amber and Eric Hoffman, who spent more than a decade writing about food and travel for publications and tourism boards, used Gemini and Perplexity in parallel to plan a multi-city route through France. The tools independently recommended the same itinerary: Bordeaux, La Rochelle, and Nantes, with a day trip to Clisson.

The result was roughly 80% accurate - strong on major decisions, unreliable on specifics.

Where AI Excelled

Both tools selected a country the Hoffmans didn't know well, sequenced three cities logically, and identified a workable train route between them. The recommendations surfaced La Rochelle, a port town neither the Hoffmans nor their well-traveled friends had considered before.

Restaurant recommendations landed roughly 80% of the time. AI directed them to a Bordeaux food market they returned to three days in a row.

"AI was excellent at the big decisions and unreliable on the details," Amber Hoffman said. "It chose the right country, cities, and route - then sent us to a wine tasting that didn't exist."

Where It Failed

Hours and menu details were frequently wrong. When asked to replicate the open-air market dining experience they found in Bordeaux at other stops, AI recommendations missed the mark.

One specific failure: AI suggested a wine tasting that had no actual existence. The tools couldn't grasp nuance or understand how to adapt a successful experience from one city to another.

What This Means for Travel Writers

The Hoffmans see a clear division of labor emerging. AI now handles the structural work - route planning, identifying destinations, basic restaurant discovery. Travelers still need to verify details themselves before booking.

For travel content creators, the implication is direct: AI will absorb logistics and listicles. First-hand storytelling and lived experience become more valuable, not less.

Amber Hoffman, who also consults with companies on AI visibility, approached the experiment as both traveler and researcher - testing not just whether AI could plan a trip, but how accurately it surfaces real-world hospitality businesses.

The full account of what AI got right and wrong across all four destinations is published on Food & Drink Destinations.

For AI for Writers, this experiment offers a practical case study in how generative tools perform on research and verification tasks - core skills for anyone writing about real-world subjects.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)