Lawmakers Push to Limit AI-Powered Surveillance Under FISA
Congress faces a deadline of April 30 to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a law that allows the government to collect electronic communications from foreigners without a warrant-even when they communicate with U.S. citizens. The reauthorization fight has intensified as lawmakers warn that artificial intelligence could dramatically expand the government's ability to search these databases for information about Americans.
President Trump supports an 18-month reauthorization, arguing the law is essential for national security. But opposition in both chambers has grown, particularly around concerns about warrantless searches of Americans' communications.
The AI Problem
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., highlighted the surveillance risk in a press briefing this week. "Imagine instead of doing a query with one person that you turned AI loose on these databases," he said. "There's virtually nothing the government can't know about you."
Senator Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, pointed to documented abuses. The FBI increased warrantless searches of Americans' communications by more than a third last year, according to Wyden. Past searches have targeted Black Lives Matter protesters, political donors, elected officials, and even a state judge who complained about police misconduct.
The Reform Bill
Massie and Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colorado, introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act this week. The bill would require federal and local agencies to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before conducting surveillance on Americans.
Boebert said the government has treated the Fourth Amendment "like a suggestion." She called the current system a "massive surveillance machine that tracks, scans, and spies on law-abiding Americans without a warrant, without probable cause, and without any accountability."
Wyden countered arguments that existing safeguards address the problem. "The facts show otherwise," he said, citing years of documented abuses despite claims of reform.
For government employees and decision-makers working on policy, understanding these technical and legal dimensions matters. AI Learning Path for Policy Makers covers how AI intersects with governance and data-driven decisions-directly relevant to debates over surveillance authority and algorithmic oversight.
Your membership also unlocks:
