Most health system finance leaders run AI pilots as concerns about errors and dependency grow, HFMA survey finds

27% of health finance executives are deploying AI at scale in revenue cycle operations, but an equal share fear errors will spread faster than staff can catch them. Workforce gaps and payer tensions remain unresolved.

Categorized in: AI News Finance
Published on: May 22, 2026
Most health system finance leaders run AI pilots as concerns about errors and dependency grow, HFMA survey finds

A quarter of health finance leaders worry AI errors will outpace human oversight

More than a quarter of health system financial executives are scaling AI across revenue cycle operations, but concerns about error detection and external dependencies are slowing adoption, according to a Healthcare Financial Management Association survey of 95 finance professionals.

Twenty-seven percent of respondents said their organizations are deploying AI at scale across multiple functions. Another 53% are running pilots in select areas.

The same proportion-25%-expressed concern that AI errors could be scaled faster than humans can catch them. An equal share worried about increased dependency on external partners for AI services.

Twenty-one percent cited concerns about workforce disruption or morale. Eighteen percent flagged regulatory or compliance risks.

Mid-cycle operations see biggest expected impact

Financial leaders expect AI to reshape mid-cycle operations most significantly, with 26.3% naming that area as the primary focus. The front end accounts for 7.4% of expected changes, while the back end represents 16.8%.

Workforce readiness gaps persist

Few executives believe their teams are prepared for the skills required over the next five years. Only 7.4% said the workforce is very prepared, while 4.2% said it's very unprepared. Forty-four percent rated themselves as somewhat prepared, and 16.8% as somewhat unprepared.

Recruitment in revenue cycle roles is already difficult. Dr. Gerard Brogan, senior vice president and chief revenue officer at Northwell Health, compared the situation to finding blacksmiths when the Model-T arrives. "Will you be able to find the workforce to do this work?" he said in the HFMA report.

Autonomous coding tools are particularly affecting hiring. Candidates hear about AI replacing coding jobs and choose other careers.

Payer friction remains unresolved

Technology has not resolved long-standing tensions between providers and payers. Candice Powers, chief revenue officer at USA Health, said the focus on AI and cost reduction misses a basic problem: "We just want to be paid for the services we're doing."

Powers called for better collaboration across all stakeholders. "The patient is getting lost in this," she said.

Market projections suggest significant cost reduction potential

The U.S. revenue cycle management market totals approximately $90.6 billion today. Projections show it could reach nearly $308 billion by 2030.

A McKinsey study cited in the HFMA report suggests AI could cut collection costs by 30% to 60%, optimize payment accuracy, and free staff to focus on higher-value work and patient experience.

Most executives plan to pursue a "buy, build, or partner" strategy rather than choosing one approach exclusively.

Learn more about AI for Finance or explore the AI Learning Path for CFOs to understand how to manage AI deployment risks and workforce transitions in your organization.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)