Driving the talent agenda through AI and human decision-making
AI is now part of everyday HR across the Gulf. It drafts job descriptions, screens applications, coordinates outreach, and supports interviews. The upside is speed and consistency. The risk is scaling mistakes just as fast.
The goal isn't automation for its own sake. It's better decisions. That means validated science, transparent systems, and accountable humans. Technology should speed up good practice, not replace it.
Adoption has outpaced assurance
Once AI touches selection, promotion, or performance, the bar rises. You need to know what the model measures, how stable it is across languages and cultures, and who answers for errors. You also need to explain decisions to candidates, regulators, and stakeholders.
Regulators in the GCC are clear on this. Frameworks like the UAE PDPL and Saudi PDPL align with global standards, and free zones such as DIFC and ADGM expect lawful, auditable automated decision-making. Saudi's SDAIA AI principles reinforce explainability, fairness, and oversight.
- Document model purpose, inputs, and design choices.
- Validate against job-relevant constructs; avoid proxy signals.
- Test for adverse impact across nationalities, languages, and genders.
- Run DPIAs where required; keep audit trails of changes and reviews.
- Ensure candidates can question outcomes and request human review.
UAE PDPL overview and SDAIA AI principles are useful starting points.
The two risks that matter most in the region
- Bias amplification: Historical data bakes in patterns you may want to move past-like over-weighting certain schools, punishing non-linear careers, or preferring communication styles tied to background. Without intent and testing, AI can scale these patterns while looking "objective."
- Erosion of trust: Candidates know when AI is involved. If the process is opaque, even fair decisions feel unfair. In government entities, family-owned groups, and national champions, perceived fairness is as critical as technical accuracy.
Interviews at scale
Structured, criterion-based interviews are still among the most predictive, defensible tools we have. The problem is scale. Reviewing video interviews and transcripts across roles, languages, and markets burns hours and introduces variability-despite good intentions.
The question isn't whether interviews stay central. It's how to keep their rigor while removing bottlenecks.
A disciplined assistant: Aon Interview Agent
Aon Interview Agent (AIA) was built to help scale structured interviews across the GCC without trading off fairness, validity, or defensibility. Candidates respond asynchronously to standardized, competency-based questions aligned to validated frameworks such as Encompass.
Responses are transcribed and analyzed against clear behavioral anchors. Instead of raw footage, recruiters get concise summaries, behavior-linked evaluations, and a suggested rating with transparent rationale. Crucially, nothing runs end to end without people-recruiters can review videos and transcripts, probe the AI's reasoning, and make the final call.
Fairness and defensibility by design
AIA focuses on the content of what candidates say, not how they look or sound. That reduces the impact of visual and auditory cues that can bias outcomes across cultures and languages.
Data quality indicators flag incomplete or low-fidelity responses so humans can intervene. Prompts and scoring criteria are validated against established constructs. The system supports documentation, auditability, and bias testing to help meet regional data protection rules and global best practice.
Large language models can approximate human scoring of narrative responses and save time-but only when bounded by clear constructs, stable anchors, and ongoing monitoring. With those guardrails, AI reduces noise and increases consistency, giving recruiters more time for judgment where it counts.
What this means for talent leaders
- Decide what "good" looks like for each role. Translate it into observable behaviors.
- Standardize structured interviews and keep questions tightly tied to job-relevant criteria.
- Put governance in place: owners, audit trails, change control, and DPIAs.
- Choose tools that keep humans in the loop and explain how ratings were formed.
- Pilot with diverse groups; test for bias across languages and nationalities before scaling.
- Train recruiters to review, challenge, and override AI outputs when needed.
- Tell candidates where AI is used and how to request human review.
AI is not a talent strategy. It's a capability inside one. With the right foundations, tools like Aon Interview Agent help scale interviews across the GCC without sacrificing fairness, credibility, or candidate experience. Without those foundations, the same tools can magnify existing problems.
AI isn't going away-and scrutiny isn't either. The companies that win the next decade of hiring in the Gulf will make better decisions, not just faster ones.
If you're upskilling HR teams on practical AI skills, explore curated options by role at Complete AI Training.
Your membership also unlocks:
