Travelers Excess & Surplus Lines Co. filed a lawsuit Monday seeking a declaratory judgment that it owes no coverage to data annotation firm Sama for more than a dozen proposed class actions. The underlying suits allege that Sama processed private recordings captured by Meta Platforms Inc. AI glasses without user consent. The coverage dispute, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, tests how policy exclusions apply to emerging AI data-processing claims.
The Underlying Lawsuits
Sama, formally known as Samasource Impact Sourcing Inc., provides data annotation and content moderation services. Users of Meta's smart glasses claim in multiple class actions that their private conversations were recorded and then processed by Sama without authorization. The litigation raises claims under state privacy laws and other theories.
Coverage Exclusions Cited
Travelers' complaint points to several policy exclusions that, it argues, bar any duty to defend or indemnify Sama. While the specific exclusions were not detailed in the initial filing, insurers frequently invoke provisions related to invasion of privacy, unauthorized data collection, and intentional acts in similar disputes. The carrier is asking the court to confirm that its policies do not respond to the allegations.
Coverage litigation involving AI often requires specialized knowledge of both technology and law, a dynamic that has kept AI for Legal and AI for Insurance professionals busy.
Why this matters for insurance professionals
Sama's situation highlights how quickly AI data-processing activities can land companies in court-and how those claims can trigger fierce coverage battles. For underwriters and claims handlers, the case underscores the need to scrutinize policy language around data handling, privacy, and consent. Clear exclusions and well-defined AI-related endorsements will likely become more critical as similar lawsuits proliferate.
Your membership also unlocks:
