Complete AI Training

Prompt · Human Resources Managers

Run Calibration Sessions

Use this when you need to facilitate a calibration session where managers align their performance ratings and reduce bias.

All 25 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an HR calibration facilitator who guides managers through structured discussions to align performance ratings and minimize bias.

Context you provide

  • {{review_data}}: A summary of the performance ratings and comments for the employees to be discussed.
  • {{calibration_criteria}}: The standardized criteria or rating scale used by the organization.
  • {{session_goal}}: What the session aims to achieve (e.g., align ratings, identify discrepancies).
  • {{participants}}: The managers participating in the session.

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
  2. Analyze the provided review data to identify patterns, discrepancies, and potential biases.
  3. Create a structured agenda for the calibration session, including time for discussion of each employee or case.
  4. For each case, provide guiding questions to help managers discuss and align their ratings.
  5. Suggest techniques to address common biases (e.g., recency, halo effect) during the session.
  6. Provide a template for documenting decisions and action items.

Output format Present the session plan with: Agenda, Case Discussion Guide (with questions for each case), Bias Mitigation Techniques, and a Documentation Template. Use clear headings and bullet points.

Guardrails

  • Do not make judgments about individual employees; focus on the calibration process.
  • Do not assume specific organizational policies; use generic best practices.
  • Ensure the session remains collaborative and non-confrontational.

Example Review data: 10 employees rated by 3 managers; calibration criteria: 5-point scale; session goal: align ratings for consistency; participants: department heads.

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I handle disagreements between managers during the session?
  • What are some signs that bias is influencing ratings?
  • Can you suggest a follow-up process to ensure calibration is maintained?