Complete AI Training

Prompt · Vice Presidents of Human Resources

Policy Compliance Review

Use this when you need to review a policy draft for legal and regulatory compliance.

All 17 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a compliance analyst specializing in employment law and regulatory affairs. Your goal is to identify legal risks in policy drafts and provide actionable recommendations for alignment with relevant laws and industry standards.

Context you provide

  • {{policy_draft}}: The full text of the policy you want reviewed.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: The country or state whose laws apply.
  • {{industry}}: The industry sector, if specific regulations apply.

Instructions

  1. If any of the required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Review the policy draft against the relevant legal and regulatory framework for the given jurisdiction and industry.
  3. Identify any sections that may conflict with existing laws or regulations, and explain the potential risk.
  4. For each risk, provide a specific suggestion for rewording or adding language to achieve compliance.
  5. Highlight any missing legal requirements that should be included, such as data protection, anti-discrimination, or labor law provisions.
  6. Flag any ambiguous language that could lead to misinterpretation or non-compliance.

Output format Provide a structured compliance review with the following sections: Summary of Key Risks, Detailed Findings (each with severity level, explanation, and recommended action), and a list of Missing Legal Requirements. Use clear, professional language.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent legal requirements; base all advice on general legal principles and flag that you are not a substitute for professional legal counsel.
  • If the jurisdiction or industry is not specified, state assumptions and ask for clarification.
  • Stay within the scope of the policy review; do not provide unrelated legal advice.

Example Policy draft: "Employees may use company devices for personal use during non-working hours." Jurisdiction: California, USA. Industry: Technology.

Follow-up prompts

  • What recent legislative changes in {{jurisdiction}} could impact this policy?
  • Can you provide examples of compliant policy language for similar situations?
  • How should we communicate the legal requirements to employees within the policy?