ArXiv Will Ban Researchers for a Year If AI Wrote Their Paper
ArXiv, the preprint repository used by millions of researchers, is issuing one-year bans to authors whose submissions contain clear signs of unchecked AI generation. The policy takes effect immediately for papers with undeniable evidence that large language models produced the content without human review.
Hallucinated citations and stray chatbot dialogue are the types of traces moderators will flag. Thomas Dietterich, who chairs the computer science section, said that when such evidence appears, "we can't trust anything in the paper."
What the Ban Means
Authors serving the one-year ban must then have their next submission accepted by a peer-reviewed venue before ArXiv will host it again. The penalty operates as a one-strike rule, but moderators flag issues, section chairs confirm the evidence, and authors can appeal before any ban takes effect.
This is not a blanket prohibition on using LLMs. Dietterich framed the policy as requiring authors to take "full responsibility" for their work, regardless of how it was generated. Researchers who submit content containing plagiarism, errors, incorrect references, or misleading information straight from a chatbot will own those mistakes the same way they would any other.
Why ArXiv Is Acting Now
ArXiv has grown into the primary channel for sharing work in computer science, mathematics, and related fields. Papers posted there circulate before peer review, making the platform influential for how research spreads across academia.
The repository has already implemented barriers to low-effort submissions. First-time posters need endorsement from an established author. ArXiv also recently became an independent nonprofit after two decades at Cornell-a shift that should help it fund more aggressive measures against AI-generated content.
Recent peer-reviewed research has found that fabricated citations are climbing in biomedical fields, with LLMs identified as the likely cause. The problem extends beyond academia, but researchers face particular pressure to maintain citation integrity.
What Authors Should Know
Using AI to help write, edit, or organize a paper is permitted. The requirement is that authors verify the output before submission. Leaving chatbot comments in the final manuscript or including references that don't exist will trigger moderator review and potential penalties.
For researchers relying on preprints to share findings quickly, understanding these boundaries matters. The policy sets a clear standard: if you put your name on it, you vouch for it.
- One-year ban for submissions with incontrovertible evidence of unreviewed AI generation
- Future submissions must be peer-reviewed elsewhere before ArXiv will accept them
- Appeals process allows authors to contest moderator decisions before penalties apply
Learn more about responsible AI use in research with AI Research Courses or explore best practices through Generative AI and LLM Courses.
Your membership also unlocks:
