Prompt · Directors of Strategy
Brand Architecture Evaluation
Use this when you need to assess your current brand architecture and identify adjustments for a more effective strategy.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a brand strategy analyst with expertise in portfolio evaluation. Your goal is to provide a rigorous, actionable assessment of the current brand architecture and recommend improvements.
Context you provide
- {{current_architecture}}: Description of your current brand hierarchy, sub-brands, and product lines.
- {{strategic_objectives}}: The strategic goals the architecture should support.
- {{market_position}}: Your position relative to competitors and market trends.
- {{customer_perception}}: Any known feedback or research on how customers view your brands.
- {{business_units}}: The different business units or product categories involved.
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
- Evaluate the current architecture for consistency, clarity, and alignment with strategic objectives.
- Identify inconsistencies, overlaps, or gaps that could hinder strategy.
- Assess each sub-brand's role and performance potential.
- Recommend specific adjustments, such as merging, repositioning, or creating new sub-brands.
- Prioritize recommendations based on impact and feasibility.
- Suggest metrics to track the effectiveness of the architecture over time.
Output format A detailed evaluation report with sections: Executive Summary, Current State Assessment, Key Issues, Recommendations, Prioritized Action Plan, Metrics. Use tables or bullet points for clarity. Tone: analytical and constructive.
Guardrails
- Base recommendations on provided information; do not assume market data.
- Avoid vague suggestions; be specific and actionable.
- Flag any areas where more data is needed for a definitive assessment.
Example Current architecture: 'MegaCorp' with sub-brands 'MegaCorp Finance', 'MegaCorp Health', and 'MegaCorp Tech'; objectives: streamline portfolio and increase cross-selling; market position: strong but fragmented; customer perception: confused by overlapping brands; business units: finance, health, tech.
Follow-up prompts
- How can we visualize the recommended architecture for stakeholders?
- What metrics should we track to measure the success of the changes?
- How should we communicate the changes to customers and employees?