Most Workers Juggle Seven Communication Tools, Survey Finds
A new survey of 2,000 workers and IT leaders reveals a widening gap between how organizations deploy communication systems and how employees actually work. The research, conducted by Vanson Bourne for Mitel, exposes significant friction in workforce productivity driven by fragmented tools, unsupported AI adoption, and security risks.
The numbers tell a stark story: 57% of workers waste time switching between an average of seven communication tools. Half of frontline workers report delays in completing tasks. Over three-quarters use non-approved channels for work-related purposes, creating data exposure and compliance risks that concern 90% of IT decision-makers.
The Pressure to Make Broken Systems Work
Nearly two-thirds of workers (63%) feel pressured to "make it work" with tools not designed for their roles. For frontline workers-those in healthcare, retail, manufacturing, and hospitality-the pressure climbs to 71%.
The consequences extend beyond productivity. Frontline workers report that communication failures delay task completion (54%), reduce service quality (46%), and create safety risks (35%). When official channels fail, workers improvise. They adopt personal messaging apps, consumer-grade collaboration platforms, and other workarounds to serve customers and patients quickly.
IT leaders acknowledge the problem: 89% say some parts of the workforce are better served by communication tools than others. Yet 93% of these same leaders consider communication tools strategically critical to operations. Only 34% of workers agree the tools are highly effective.
AI Adoption Outpaces Organizational Support
Organizations are investing heavily in AI, but workers feel abandoned in the process. Two-thirds (66%) believe their organization does not adequately support AI use. Half of workers turn to non-approved AI tools to fill the gap-a practice IT leaders worry about.
While 52% of workers use AI regularly, only 33% feel comfortable doing so. IT leaders cite three main concerns: incorrect or misleading outputs (76%), regulatory compliance (75%), and data protection (75%). This mismatch creates what researchers call "Shadow AI"-unauthorized tools spreading through organizations faster than IT can govern them.
Voice Remains the Trusted Choice in Crisis
One finding cuts across all the noise: when speed and clarity matter, workers reach for voice. Nearly 80% rely on voice communication when rapid action and immediate alignment are required.
Healthcare professionals show the strongest preference, with 56% adopting a voice-first approach during urgent situations. Messaging platforms work fine for routine collaboration, but real-time conversation still wins when stakes are high.
Hybrid Infrastructure as a Practical Middle Ground
Most IT leaders have already moved toward hybrid infrastructure for communication tools. Eighty-seven percent use it; 93% say it provides the flexibility and control needed without creating unmanageable complexity.
This approach allows organizations to modernize systems while maintaining oversight. It acknowledges that employees need choice in how they communicate, but IT requires visibility and security standards.
What This Means for Communications Professionals
For PR and communications teams, the research highlights a critical challenge: internal communication strategies must account for the actual tools employees use, not the systems IT deploys. When workers jump between seven platforms, official messaging gets lost in the noise.
The findings also suggest that communications professionals should advocate for alignment between IT investments and employee experience. A tool that IT leaders consider mission-critical but workers find ineffective creates a credibility problem for any organization trying to communicate change or strategy.
Learn more about AI for PR & Communications and how to address productivity challenges in fragmented work environments.
Your membership also unlocks:
