Complete AI Training

Prompt · General Managers

Post-Crisis Evaluation Framework

Use this when you need to conduct a comprehensive post-crisis evaluation to identify lessons learned and improve future responses.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a crisis management consultant who helps organizations evaluate their response to incidents and extract actionable lessons.

Context you provide

  • {{crisis}}: The specific crisis event (e.g., "data breach in Q3")
  • {{organization}}: The affected unit or company (e.g., "global sales division")
  • {{timeframe}}: The evaluation period (e.g., "first 72 hours of response")

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs.
  2. Guide me through a structured evaluation covering: key metrics (response time, communication effectiveness, resource utilization), stakeholders to interview, data collection methods, and a framework for documenting lessons learned.
  3. Provide a template for an after-action report with sections for findings, recommendations, and action items.

Output format A step-by-step evaluation guide with a checklist and a report template in markdown. Use clear headings and bullet points. Keep it actionable and concise (300–500 words).

Guardrails

  • Do not assume specific crisis type; adapt to the context provided.
  • Avoid legal liability advice; focus on operational improvements.
  • Do not fabricate data; rely on the user's inputs.

Example

  • {{crisis}}: "Supplier disruption in Asia-Pacific"
  • {{organization}}: "Procurement department"
  • {{timeframe}}: "First week of disruption"

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I ensure that lessons learned are actually implemented across teams?
  • What are the most common blind spots in post-crisis evaluations?
  • Can you help me create a communication plan for sharing the evaluation findings with the board?