Complete AI Training
Sign inGet my AI kit

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

AI agent for ux/ui designers

Interview Synthesis Evidence Agent

A findings summary where each insight shows how many participants support it

Interview Synthesis Evidence Agent: what goes in, what the agent does and what you get

What it does

After a round of user interviews, designers tend to remember the loudest quotes rather than the most common needs. This agent reads every transcript and note, tags each statement by need, pain point and context, and groups the tags into themes. For each theme it counts how many different participants support it and attaches their quotes. A participant who repeats a point counts once. A finding that rests on too few people fails the check; the agent searches the transcripts for more evidence phrased differently, or marks the finding as weak. It links each finding to the research question it answers and drafts a summary with quotes and counts. The designer reviews findings before they are shared. Edge case: one participant saying the same thing five times still counts as one person.

How it works

Follow the arrows from top to bottom. The orange dashed arrow is the loop: when a check fails, the agent goes back and tries again.

Start and resultWhat it doesA check on its own workWaits for your OKGoes back and retries
Yes, continueApprovedNo 1 STARTS WHEN Interview round completes 2 USES A TOOL Read transcripts and notes 3 DOES Tag statements by need, pain point and context 4 DOES Group tags into themes and count participants 5 CHECKS THE RESULT Does each finding have enough distinct participants? If not: search transcripts for more evidence or mark thefinding as weak. Back to step 4. 6 DOES Draft findings with quotes and counts 7 YOU APPROVE Designer reviews findings before sharing 8 RESULT Findings summary in the research repository
Read the steps as a list
  1. Interview round completes
  2. Read transcripts and notes
  3. Tag statements by need, pain point and context
  4. Group tags into themes and count participants
  5. Does each finding have enough distinct participants?If not: search transcripts for more evidence or mark the finding as weak. Back to step 4.
  6. Draft findings with quotes and counts
  7. Designer reviews findings before sharingThe agent waits here for your OK.
  8. Findings summary in the research repository

How it decides

A theme becomes a finding only if it is supported by the minimum number of distinct participants. Repeated statements by one person count once.

  • Count each participant once per theme
  • Mark findings with fewer than the minimum as weak
  • Link every finding to the research question it answers

Make it yours

Every agent is a starting point. You choose these settings for your own situation.

  • Minimum participants per finding (default 3)
  • Tag set to use
  • Summary format
  • Whether to include weak findings

What keeps you in control

It always asks you first

  • Sharing findings with the team

Hard limits

  • Removes names before sharing quotes
  • Never invents quotes

It stops when

  • Done: findings approved and stored
  • Stop: transcripts missing or incomplete; list which

Set it up

We guide you through the set-up, step by step

Members get the full set-up guide for this agent. No technical skills needed: you copy, paste and upload.

10 minto set it up in your AI
5 AIsChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, Grok
  • One set of instructions to paste into your AI, with the clicks for ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Gemini and Grok
  • The agent then walks you through connecting your own data, one source at a time
  • A downloadable copy with the flow chart, the rules and the full guide
Get access to this agent

An example run

What happensEight interviews in April produced 412 tagged statements. The theme 'export is confusing' looked strong, but the check showed it came from only two people, one of whom said it four times. The agent searched again and found a third participant who described 'not finding where the file went'. It marked the finding as medium. The designer approved five findings for the team.

More agents for ux/ui designers